The judge allows the issue of copyright to “New York Times” against Openai to go forward:

A federal judge refused on Wednesday to request Openai to cancel a lawsuit for copyright from New York Times This claims that the technology company took advantage of the newspaper’s content without permission or payment.

in commander Judge Sydney Stein, from the southern circle in New York, allowed the narrowing of the lawsuit, but Judge Sydney Stein has narrowed the scope of the lawsuit but allowed the claims to violate copyright in the case.

Stein was not immediately called an opinion, but he promised to come “urgently.”

The decision is a victory for the newspaper, which joined other publishers, including New York Daily News The Center for Investigative Reports, to challenge the way Openai collected huge amounts of data from the web to train the famous artificial intelligence service, ChatgPt.

Lawyer Stephen Lieberman, in the legal team that represents news publishers, celebrated the judge.

“We are the opportunity to present a jury with the facts on how Openai and Microsoft violently benefited from stealing the original content of newspapers throughout the country,” Lieberman said in a statement to NPR.

Lawyers l New York Times We believe that the paper articles are one of the largest sources of texts protected by the copyright that OpenAI used to build Chatgpt in Premier Ai Chatbot, and they call that Openai has violated copyright laws in the newspaper’s press square.

Openai did not immediately return a request for comment.

Openai leaders have argued that the company’s collective data, including articles The TimesIt is protected by a legal doctrine known as “fair use”.

It is allowed to reuse materials without permission in certain cases, including research, teaching and comment.

The judge’s ruling means that the lawsuit can now proceed with the trial, but the date of the trial has not been determined. Evidence collection is expected to occur, including deposits with executives on both sides of the case, in secret, along with pre -trial sessions to settle disputes over evidence and other matters.

The legal battle between one of the most influential news in the world and the leading AI company in Silicon Valley places a lot on the news line and the future of artificial intelligence tools.

For publishers, fear is that strong Chatbots that can quickly summarize news articles when querying means that readers often visit news sites, which leads to a decrease in ads that may affect the end result of the industry.

Although the lawsuit is only called Openai and Backer Financial, Microsoft, other artificial intelligence companies also install the web for content to train their models. For the largest part, the artificial intelligence industry followed the progress of Openai when it comes to training Chatbot and other artificial intelligence services, which work under the hypothesis that processing data on the open web in Chatbot answers is legally protected under the Publishing Rights Law.

But the law is still unstable in this regard.

The courts said that the fair use of copyright -protected work should generate something new “transforming”, comment on it or indicate an original work. The Times It argues that this does not apply to how to reproduce Openai of the original reports of the paper.

Another part of the legal analysis will include an idea known as “market replacement”, indicating whether Chatbot answers is a substitute for reading, for example The Times Web site, or if Chatbots and newspapers work in different markets.

At a hearing in New York in January, the lawyers of the publishers have argued that when questions were asked about ChatGPT on the topics that cover it The TimesChatbot regurgited articles literally.

However, the Openai legal team has re -tackled the claims specifically to force Chatbot mainly on the spit on large pieces that were raised from the paper location. This is not the way most people interact with service, nor how Chatbot is designed to work.

“This is not the document retrieval system. It is a big language,” Gratz said.