We like to think that we are honest about information, that we want answers when they are helpful and avoid them when they are not. In fact, our relationship with knowledge is much more messy, shaped as much by emotion as by reason.
Published in Current opinion in psychologyThe new findings challenge the common view that information avoidance – often described as “willful ignorance” – is primarily about evading responsibility. Instead, the research suggests that avoiding information and seeking out painful truths stem from the same emotional process.
According to the researchers, people manage information by balancing two competing discomforts: the stress of uncertainty and the emotional impact of knowledge. Which is easier to bear in the moment often determines whether people turn toward or move away from the information.
“Our decisions about information – whether to confront it or avoid it – are not only functional, but often emotional,” the researchers said in a study. “We constantly switch between the desire to know and the instinct to protect ourselves from information, weighing which one will be less harmful: painful truth or uncertainty.” press release.
How people decide when to know and when to look away
To explain why people sometimes avoid information and other times actively seek it out, the researchers propose a simple decision model centered around emotional tolerance. At any given moment, people seem to be weighing two internal limits: how much uncertainty they can tolerate, and how much emotional impact they can handle by knowing the truth.
When uncertainty becomes emotionally stressful, people are more likely to seek out information—even if that information is painful or cannot change the outcome. In contrast, when the expected emotional weight of knowledge is difficult to bear, people tend to delay or avoid learning it, even when the information is useful. In both cases, the behavior serves the same purpose: regulating emotional stress by choosing the form of discomfort that seems most manageable at the moment.
The model also helps explain why information behavior shifts so quickly depending on context. The same person may avoid information in one situation and seek it in another, not because his values or goals have changed, but because his emotional capabilities have changed. Factors such as stress, timing, and perceived risk can tip the scale toward uncertainty or toward truth.
Through this lens, information avoidance and information seeking do not represent opposing tendencies or signs of inconsistency. They are flexible responses generated by the same emotional mechanism, a mechanism that constantly balances the fear of knowing with the discomfort of not knowing.
Read moreSmiling during the holidays can instantly change how people see you
Two psychological tools for living with uncertainty
The findings suggest that our relationship with information depends not only on curiosity or avoidance, but on emotional self-management. Researchers argue that the desire to know and the desire not to know are not opposing forces, but rather two psychological tools that people use to deal with threatening or overwhelming situations.
This perspective has practical implications. In settings such as health care, public communication, and institutional decision-making, how and when information is delivered may be as important as what is shared. Access to facts alone does not determine how people respond; Emotional preparedness plays a crucial role.
In an age where information is almost always at hand, the study offers a reminder that knowledge is not just something we accumulate. It’s something we actively choose – by evaluating which discomfort to endure in the moment: facing the truth, or living with uncertainty.
Read more: Gaslighters take on the learning process, making their targets question themselves
Article sources
Our writers at discovermagazine.com use peer-reviewed studies and high-quality sources for our articles, and our editors review for scientific accuracy and editorial standards. Review the sources used below for this article: