
Andrew Harnik/father
President Donald Trump started the week with a barrage of tweets early in the morning to bomb the courts for preventing his executive order to travel. But when doing this, it may have made it likely that the courts will continue to ban the ban.
People, lawyers and courts can call what they want, but I call it what we need and what it is, and the travel ban!
Donald Trump (@realdonaldtrum) June 5, 2017
The justice department should have remained with the original travel ban, not the correct version of the political point of view they presented to SC
Donald Trump (@realdonaldtrum) June 5, 2017
The Justice Department must request an urgent hearing to ban accelerated travel before the Supreme Court – and search for a tougher version!
Donald Trump (@realdonaldtrum) June 5, 2017
However, we enter extremist people into the United States to help maintain the integrity of our country. The courts are slow and political!
Donald Trump (@realdonaldtrum) June 5, 2017
These tweets followed several through the weekend on the ban and terrorist attack in London, including this sequence of Saturday evening:
We need to be smart, awake and difficult. We need the courts to restore our rights. We need to ban travel as an additional level of safety!
Donald Trump (@realdonaldtrum) June 3, 2017
In January, Trump signed an executive order prohibiting citizens from seven countries with an Islamic majority from entering the United States for 90 days, in addition to stopping the refugee resettlement program for 120 days (and for refugees for Syrian refugees indefinitely). When the courts prevented her, instead of appealing to the Supreme Court, Trump signed a modified copy of the matter. New ban He canceled the old, reduced the number of countries banned from seven to six, and added exceptions and concessions. However, the federal courts in Maryland and Hawaii prevented it, and now the Ministry of Justice has resumed the Supreme Court to restore this second edition of the ban.
The biggest question in litigation about the ban is whether the courts should focus only on the text of the matter or also consider Trump’s comments from the campaign’s path, and even during its presidency, to determine whether the regime uses national security as an excuse to ban Muslims from the country. The president’s lawyers argue that the courts must focus on the text of the matter and postpone the president’s authority on national security. Tweet Trump on Monday morning over the end of the weekend makes it difficult for the courts to justify this.
The travel ban is supposed to be a temporary treatment so that the government can review the examination procedures. But Trump’s tweets make it seem to have the same ban. Trump repeatedly uses the word “ban” when his administration instead sought to name it temporarily.
Stephen Vladik, an expert in national security and constitutional law at the University of Texas Faculty of Law, says that tweets “undermine the best argument for the government – that the courts should not look beyond the four corners of the executive system itself.” “If Trump’s statements should be concerned at the time (which is a point that the reasonable people will continue to difference), the more President Trump says while the litigation continues to indicate that the matter is an excuse, the more difficult it is to persuade even sympathetic judges and judges that the text of the matter only matters.” Once the courts start looking at the president’s statements, it is not difficult to find those that raise questions about the hostile motives of Muslims.
Even the president’s allies admit his tweets a problem. George Conway, the husband of the best Trump Killian Conway, the husband of Trump Konway, Respond To Trump on Twitter by noting that the public prosecutor’s office – who is defending the travel ban – has become more difficult.
These tweets may make some PPL feel better, but they will definitely not help OSG get 5 votes in Scotus, which already matters. sad. https://t.co/zvhcyfm8hr
George Conway (@gtconway3d) June 5, 2017
Konway, who recently withdrawn his name from considering a position in the Ministry of Justice, then continued to clarify his position.
2) … of course my wonderful wife. That is why I said what I said this morning. Every reasonable lawyer in Whco and every politician …
George Conway (@gtconway3d) June 5, 2017
3) … appointed in Doj WD agrees with me (as some have already told me). The Labor Party cannot be emphasized enough that tweets on legal issues …
George Conway (@gtconway3d) June 5, 2017
4) … seriously undermines the administration and Potus agenda – and those who support it, as I do, they need to enhance this PT and not shy about it.
George Conway (@gtconway3d) June 5, 2017
Trump may soon see his tweets used against him in court. Omar Jadawat, the lawyer of the American Civil Liberties Union who argued the case before the Court of Appeal in the fourth district, He said the Washington Post This morning, ACLU legal team is considering adding Trump’s tweets to its arguments before the Supreme Court. “The tweets really undermine the real narration that the president’s lawyers are trying to present, which Jadi told the newspaper” What he said “in the past. mail.