The push of President Donald Trump to put the National Guard forces on the ground in many American cities created a rapid intense situation, which constitutes a new test of democracy and separating the forces.
American boycott judge Karen, one of the appointed Trump, spent on Saturday that the Trump administration could not take over the National Guard in Oregon for its deployment in the streets of Portland. When the administration tried to circumvent the ruling hours after summoning the National Guard forces in California instead, Judge IMMERGUT quickly closed it, saying that this step was “a direct violation” of its previous decision.
She left the president and his team APOPLECTIC.
Why did we write this
While President Donald Trump presses the deployment of the National Guard in Democratic Cities, the battle over the use of forces to support an illegal immigration campaign – to test the balance of powers between the executive and judicial branches.
White House Deputy Chief of Staff, Stephen Miller, criticized the first referee as a “legal rebellion” and went further after that. “The provincial court judge has no imagined authority to restrict the president and the supreme commander of the US military’s sending to defend federal lives and property.” Advertise on xAnd the referee described “one of the most terrible and dating violations of the constitutional system that we have seen at all.”
It is not the only battle that takes place in the streets – and court halls – for a major American city. Illinois and Chicago filed a lawsuit on Monday in an effort to prevent the Trump administration from deploying the National Guard forces in Texas and Ilinoi in their mandate, describing this step as “clearly illegal.” A federal judge refused to prevent publication immediately, but he asked the administration to “think strongly to stop” until a hearing was determined on Thursday.
These battles, in addition to the increasingly hot speech, are determined by the recent escalation in Mr. Trump’s efforts to normalize the use of the US military in local environments with pressure on both the judicial branch and democratic resistance states.
The administration takes the previously invisible measures in American cities by demanding an emergency situation on unauthorized immigration and public safety, and sends waves of federal agents, and a reference to the need to protect them from local demonstrators. The movements sparked confrontations with the courts.
Gerard Mageluka, historian of the Supreme Court and Constitutional Researcher at the Law College at Indiana University, says the current level of the conflict between the presidency and the judiciary is “unprecedented at the time of peace” in the history of the United States.
Professor Mageluka says that the reason for many of the Trump administration’s movements has temporarily stopped by the low courts is that many of them have a few or non -legal or non -legal precedents. He says that judges want to stop these measures because they consider their legal advantages.
More escalation may be just around the corner.
President Trump falsely claimed that Portland was “burning on the ground”, and that “rebellion” – a term that he used again and again in recent days – was behind him.
The Law of the Law of 1807 allows the president to provide the Federal National Guard units and deploy the US military at the national level, but only during specific circumstances, including rebellion and armed rebellion. Therefore, the term “rebellion” has a specific legal indication. When asked on Monday if he was planning to summon the rebellion law, President Trump said he would consider him.
“I will do it if it is necessary. So far, it wasn’t necessary. But we have a rebellion for some reason,” he said. “If people were killed, if the courts are holding us or if the conservatives or mayors were holding us, I will definitely do so.”
Democrats worry that this is the plan all the time.
“This escalation of violence is targeted, deliberate and deliberate. The Trump administration follows the playing book: causes chaos, creating fear and confusion, and making it seem that peaceful demonstrators are mob by launching gasocytes and tear gas boxes on them,” said the governor of Illinois on Monday at a news conference. “Why? To create an excuse to summon the rebellion so that it can send the military forces to our city.”
Mr. Trump’s allies in the legal community say that the low -court judges have overpowered their authority over and over again in frustrating the president. Temporary restrictions are just their last frustration.
“The case is that judges make Snap rulings,” says Josh Blackman, a professor of law in South Texas in Houston and a great editor for the Heritage Foundation in the Heritage Heritage Heritage Guide.
In the Portland case, “The court does not trust the Trump administration. The administration said it needs this [deployment] “Because of the protests at the ICE facility in Oregon, the federal facilities should not need to be permission from the judge,” he says.
Aziz forces, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Chicago and a member of the Illinois Branch in the American Civil Liberties Union. He says that the law “requires goodwill” to prove that conditions are being confronted with the declaration of a state of emergency.
“Just confirms that there is something when it is not clear [not] He says: “The White House or the government can say,” Anything we think is the rebellion is the rebellion “:” The White House or the government can say “anything we think is the rebellion is the rebellion.”
While Mr. Trump has repeatedly faced the minimum judges of the Court, the United States Supreme Court, which has a majority of 6-3 provinces, including three appointed judges, has been more susceptible to his approach.
The court has submitted several “Dadow Dockket” orders during the past year, which reflected the decisions of the low court. It allowed the Trump administration’s comprehensive deportation efforts to continue unarmed, including allowing racist stereotypes in ice stops, and continued mass deportations to countries other than where the immigrants came.
Mr. Trump has allowed the launch of the grades of federal employees, including those in parts of the executive branch, which was previously considered independent agencies, and a precedent was almost a precedent challenging the presidential authority. And the low courts prevented the court from issuing global judicial orders that have previously prevented the heads of both parties from taking measures at the country level until these measures were determined.
The Supreme Court started its new term on Monday, with heavy issues, including the Trump administration’s attempts to end the newly born citizenship, a legal precedent in the United States for more than a century.
Portland and Chicago cases may find their way to court on the basis of emergency as well.
“These cases will always be resumed to the Supreme Court, and you will formulate what the president is doing,” Margori Cohen, Fakhri Professor at Thomas Jefferson College of Law in San Diego and former head of the National Lawyers Syndicate.
Professor Cohen says that the constitutional system is still in effect – but it is getting weaker under pressure from the Trump administration. “The separation of power continues to apply, although the line increases dim between the three branches,” warns.
Democratic leaders in the cities and countries targeted by the Trump administration are preparing to warn.
Oregon Tina Cotik described President Trump’s actions as “an attempt to occupy and incite cities and countries that do not participate in his policy.” California Governor Gavin New Tiri Posted on X “America is on the verge of martial law.”
“Donald Trump does not use our service members as political pillars and shystep in his illegal effort to receive the cities of our nation,” said Governor Pritzker on Monday afternoon.
Chicago’s deployment follows weeks of heavy ice presence and controversial tactics throughout the city, including a midnight raid for a residential building said that agents are linked to a fabric and arrest of dozens of American citizens, including children. Internal Security Security Minister Christie Nayyim later promoted that raid With a shiny video Commentary “Chicago, we are here for you”.
ICE customers have repeatedly clashed with the demonstrators outside the BroadView suburb in Chicago, where injuries were reported to members of the clergy, politicians and correspondents. During the weekend, federal agents said they fired “defensive footage” that were injured by a woman after she was shocked and her stadium by vehicles, According to DHS. A lawyer for the woman who was shot He said in court It was federal agents who shocked them. On Monday, a alliance of journalists prosecution Ice and DHS to use excessive force against them.
In Portland, the recent confrontations between demonstrators and federal law enforcement appear to be more verbal than materialism. Since June, demonstrations have fluctuated in size outside the field ice office in Portland, where the officers sometimes called the crowd with irritation like pepper balls.
In the court file, the Ministry of Justice claimed that the demonstrators have assaulted the implementation of the federal law “rocks, bricks, spray of pepper and incendiary devices” in the facility, and impeded entry and exit from vehicles. Portland Police Office says it was made 36 arrest In the area “since the night protests began” four months ago. The activity appears to be confined, more or less, to one city block.
Employees’ book, Sarah Matusick, in Portland, Oregon, and Simon Montelik in Boston He contributed to this report.