newYou can now listen to Fox News!
The legal battle on public school bathrooms and transgender students has become in the hands of the Supreme Court, where the South Carolina Alain Wilson Prosecutor believes that it will be “death” of what he calls the “extremist left agenda”.
South Carolina asked the Supreme Court to stop the Federal Appeal Court order that gives a transgender high school student to the children’s bathrooms, a step that the state says that clashes with its law require facilities based on biological sex and come only months after the court’s disability in a Tennessee ban on sexual remedies for minors.
In the emergency file last week, Wilson said, along with state officials, that the ruling left the Berkeley County School area “stuck between an impossible rock and a difficult place.”
“I think this case is in the fourth circle, which can be decided by the US Supreme Court in the end, it will be a death in the agenda of the extremist left,” Wilson told Fox News Digital in an interview on Tuesday. “This issue is not only related to the state’s ability to protect the privacy and safety of students, but rather relates to the rights of students themselves in their schools.”
The bathrooms of all both sexes at the Denver School violates the ninth address, and the discovery of the education department
South Carolina Alan Wilson Prosecutor says that the Supreme Court should use the US decision against Skrmetti as a basis for a decline in the fourth circle ruling. (Kevin Lietsch/Getty Images)
The case restores the biological pigeon rules for students before the country’s highest court, just months after the Supreme Court supported a government ban on transitional treatments between the sexes of minors-a decision South Carolina that the lower courts should.
Wilson said: “It emphasizes the importance of countries’ ability to protect their students and their own electoral districts within their states,” Wilson said. “This is one of the issues that arose in Skrmetti’s decision.”
The fourth department ruled last month that the student, who was identified in the court documents “John de”, is allowed to use the boys toilet pending the case. The decision depends greatly on Grimm V. Gloucester County School Board, where the court saw that a transgender boy had banned the use of children’s toilet violating the condition of equal protection and ninth clubs.
But South Carolina officials argue that a crime is “credible external” and that federal courts must follow the United States’ decision against Skrmetti, because “the plaintiffs are unlikely to prevail in the end,” according to the emergency. In Skrmetti’s decision, judges rule in favor of Tennessee’s ban on the procedures for the gender transition of minors.
Scotus rules on the state’s ban on gender transition “treatments” for minors in the case of history
Activists for and against the protest against the rights of the Cross outside the US Supreme Court before the start of the United States case against the Skrmetti case on Wednesday, December 4, 2024. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc./getty Images)
As each of this court and the fourth district recognized, the main reason for this agreement that biology roots is to enhance privacy, “says the emergency file. “But recent social developments have sought to change this. Over the past fifteen years, the number of children and adolescents with gender speech defect has increased.”
The South Carolina Law, which was yearned in July 2024, states that the educational areas risk confiscating 25 % of the state’s Ministry of Education’s financing if they allow sexually transgender students using the facilities that are different from their biological gender.
The Ministry of Energy and his parents filed a lawsuit against the state in November 2024.
In January, the Ministry of Education at the Trump Administration directed schools and colleges to K-12 to recognize the ninth title strictly based on biological sex-the reflection of the rewriting of the administration for the year 2024 of the Biden Administration. The ninth title is the federal law that prohibits gender discrimination in any program or activity that receives government funding. Under the rule of former President Joe Biden for the year 2024, the term “sex” was expanded to cover sexual identity and sexual orientation.
CDC official includes “pregnant” terms and terms in the resignation letter
South Carolina Alan Wilson and state officials have submitted a judicial warrant in emergency cases asking the Supreme Court to weigh in the lower court ruling to allow a sexual transgender boy to use a men’s pigeon in Berkeley Province. (Tracy Glantz/The State/Tribune News Service; SARA D. Davis/Stringer)
Click here to get the Fox News app
“South Carolina wants the Supreme Court to take the exceptional treatment of appeal in the ongoing lower court – all of this because the state wants to prevent the ninth grade student from using boys’ courses during their appeal.”
“This issue does not provide the type of emergency that justifies such an intervention,” the statement continued. As the chief judge in the fourth district was noticed recently, there is zero evidence for this [our client’s] The use of boys tolerated even the possibility of a distance to harm to anyone. But the evidence of the state’s hostility towards it overwhelms. In fact, no classmate in the class complained that our customers used boys’ sport courses. However, South Carolina accelerated to the Supreme Court to obtain permission to permission from being subjected to discrimination imposed by the state at school, including the school discipline that he took out from the middle school last year. The Supreme Court must deny South Carolina’s extraordinary request. “
supreme court A response to emergency situations can be issued early on Friday. The court’s decision may come without a complete briefing or an oral argument, as is the typical of the rulings issued outside the full process of the Supreme Court.