Washington – Washington (AP) – supreme court You will hear arguments in the last LGBTQ+ rights case, which weighs the constitutionality of the embargo approved by nearly half of the United States in the practice known as the treatment treatment for children.
Judges Listen From a Christian advisor who challenges the Colorado law that prohibits treatment aims to change sexual inclination or sexual identity. Cali Chilies, with the support of the Republican Administration of President Donald Trump, says the law violates freedom of expression by preventing it from providing voluntary treatment based on children.
On the other hand, Colorado says that the procedure simply regulates licensed therapists by preventing a practice that has been photographed scientifically and associated with severe damage.
The arguments come after months of finding the majority of the conservative Supreme Court Countries can prohibit Health care related to transition to sexually transformed youth, a setback for LGBTQ rights. The judges are also expected to hear a case Sports post By the transgender players this term.
Colorado did not meet anyone under the law of 2019, which exempt religious ministries. State lawyers say that any therapist still allows to hold large -scale conversations based on faith with young patients about sex and sex.
“The only thing that prevents the law from therapists from doing is a treatment that seeks the pre -determined result to change the sexual tendencies of the minor or sexual identity because this treatment is not safe and ineffective.”
They said that the treatment is not just a speech – it is a health care that the governments are responsible for organizing. Violation of the law violates potential fines of $ 5,000 and suspends the license or even cancellation.
Linda Robertson is a Christian mother of four from Washington Son Ryan He underwent a promise to change his sexual inclinations after he went out to it at the age of twelve. The techniques led him to blame himself when he did not succeed, leaving him ashamed and depressed. He died in 2009, after multiple suicide attempts and an overdose of the drug at the age of twenty.
She said: “What happened in the treatment of the transfer, the Ryan Association has destroyed me and my husband.” “He completely destroyed his confidence that he may be loved or acceptable by God.”
Chiles claims that her approach is different from the type of conversion treatment that is associated with merely practices such as trauma treatment decades ago. She said that she believes that “people flourish when they live constantly with the design of God, including their biological race,” and she argues that there is no evidence of harm from her approach.
Chelse says that Colorado is distinguished because it allows advisers to confirm minors who come out as gay or sexually transformed, but they prohibit consultation like young patients who may want to change their behavior or feelings. “We do not say that this consultation must be mandatory, but if someone wants to consult, they should be able to get it.”
The Trump administration said that there are cases of first amendment with the Colorado law, which must make the law subject to higher legal standards that pass through few measures.
Chiles are represented by the Freedom Defense Alliance, a conservative legal organization that has appeared repeatedly in court in recent years. The group also represented a Christian site designer who does not want to work with husbands of the same sex and Successful challenge Colorado Anti -Discrimination Law in 2023.
The group’s argument in the case of transferring treatment also depends on another victory in 2018: The Supreme Court’s decision was found that California could not compel centers to carry the antigenant against the state to provide information about abortion. The group said that Chilis should be free of this type of Islamic State.
However, the Supreme Court also found that the regulations that are allowed only to speak “by the way”, and the state argues that hitting its law against the transfer treatment will undermine the ability of countries to regulate health care for all children.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case after the Court of Appeal in the tenth American district of Denver supported the law. Another Court of Appeal, the eleventh court of Appeal of the American Chamber of Atlanta, canceled a similar ban in Florida.
Legal quarrels continued elsewhere as well. In WisconsinThe state’s highest court cleansed the road for the state to impose its ban. In contrast, Virginia officials agreed to expand the scope of the enforcement of its law as part of an agreement with a conservative group based on the list.
___
Follow the AP coverage of the United States Supreme Court in https://appnyws.com/hub/us-supreme-court.