Reustericable grocery bags, food service containers and table tools are better for the environment of one use, even those that can be fertilizer A comprehensive study Posted in Microplastics.
The researchers made some surprising discoveries, including paper grocery bags and fertilized food service containers worse for the environment of plastic bags and starrofoom containers.
In general, the authors of the study found that one use of all species is harmful to the environment and human health that governments recommended are a direct ban.
“[An] The study concluded that the enlightened and well -studied ban in all products with a single use, and not only those made of plastic materials.
Inspired Canada’s ban on plastic packaging for one useResearchers from the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Gilf in Ontario began to understand the environmental effects of various products and packaging them better.
The authors of the study wrote: “This study evaluates the life cycle of banned plastic products and its alternatives to determine whether environmental effects can be reduced.” “The environmental effects of the bags (plastic, paper, cotton), table (plastic, woody, decomposed), containers (plastic, cineovom, decomposed).”
Researchers aim to integrate all aspects of the element’s life cycle, including manufacturing and transportation.
The study determined that a large part of the environmental impact of the Warpieted Plastic and Plastic occurred during manufacturing. Perhaps more surprising, researchers found that the same is true for decomposing alternatives.
Fertilizational table tools, for example, are categorized worse than plastic in terms of ozone exhaustion and stinging. (Satisfaction occurs when an excessive body of water becomes with nutrients.)
The study highlighted the need to move away from products, one -use packing and towards reusable alternatives.
The authors were martyred Previous study This has found that a reusable bag should be used only between three and 10 times to get a lower environmental effect for each use of any form of a single use bag.
“Often the highly used products are offered compared to or eliminating one use [sic] Their counterparts, but with the passage of time (depending on the product), the reusable products become less expensive with the low cost of use “,” Gillef University researchers books.
According to the survival of the oceanEvery year, more than 12 million tons of plastic pollution enter the Earth’s oceans, which increases 220 million tons of plastic waste that is already revolving in the waterways of the planet.
With accurate plastic pollution, which represents such arduous risks in the field of environmental and public health, governments such as Canada justified justified the reduction of a single use plastic waste.
However, studying the University of Gilf is a reminder of the need to reduce the use of all products with a single use, not only of plastic.
The study also confirms that bags, containers, and reusable table tools provide significant environmental benefits compared to one alternative with a single use.
By combining these lessons in daily life, you can significantly reduce your environmental impact while saving money as well, instead of throwing your money literally on products with a single use.
Find ways for Use less plastic and Restart containers, packaging and packaging Wasting is not only prevented from finishing in waste or ocean burials, but also reduces the demand for new products for one use.
Join the free newsletter Good news and Useful tipsAnd do not miss This wonderful list In easy ways to help yourself with the help of the planet.