A copy of this story was turned on for the first time in July. As it appears CNN is what matters to the newsletter. To get it in your inbox, subscribe for free here.
CNN
–
Let’s start in the affirmative: Republicans and Democrats meet to protect sex from the same sex Marriage to the Supreme Court.
Respect for the law of marriage He adopts marriages and has occurred among the fears among the Democrats that the same conservative majority in the Supreme Court that removed the right to abort will target gay marriage in the future.
The version, which defeated a group of Senate in the Senate, was released on Tuesday. Dozens of Republican Senators from all over the country voted with the Democrats before Thanksgiving to reduce discussion and move towards the final vote.
Related to: He met the 12 Republicans who voted to consider the law of respect for marriage
After that, he moves to the House of Representatives for approval before President Joe Biden was able to sign it.
But there is a good amount of beautiful printing.
First, the draft law does not require all countries to allow gay marriage, Although this is the current reality under ObergeFell V. Hodges 2015. Instead, if the ObergeFell Supreme Court abolishes the previous state’s marriage, then the law of marriage will require the states and the federal government to respect the marriages that were conducted in legal places.
There are religious exceptions. Republican supporters emphasized the elements in this edition of the Senate that protects non -profit and religious organizations from having to provide support for marriage of the same sex.
“I will support the alternative amendment because it will ensure the support and protection of our religious freedoms, one of the stocks in our democracy,” said Senator in Virginia, Virginia, Shelli Moore Capito. In a statement After helping to break filbuster.
It took months of efforts behind the scenes to bring 10 Republicans more than 10 people.
This is all academic now. The draft law is approved only in the event that the conservative Supreme Court now, which helped in a precedent in a precedent, was reviewing the ObergeFell V decision. Hodges, who has truly created a national marriage for couples of the same sex.
Two judges who voted in favor of this ruling were replaced by the governors appointed by Republicans, which means that if you hear the case today, there is a real possibility, it will be determined in a different way.
While Judge Samuel Aleo wanted to get rid of the precedent of abortion rights that have risen by the Supreme Court earlier this year, Arian de Vouge from CNN wrote about how the decision in DobBS against Jackson affects women’s health. Read her story.
Despite the beautiful print, it can almost not be believed Before generation, Republicans and Democrats, along with a democratic president in the 1990s, worked together to protect the “Marriage Foundation” from the same sex.
Today, Republicans and Democrats, along with a democratic president, are working together to protect gay marriage from a government institution.
During that time, general support for gay marriage grew from about a quarter of the public in the year when the marriage was aged 71 % in the Gallup survey this year.
The issue has played a role in multiple American elections, including, it can be said that those that have just happened.
Here is a brief history of equality in marriage that plays a role in the past Election years:
In 1996, the Republican majority in the House of Representatives and the Senate felt a political opening after then President Bill Clinton’s failure to allow gay people to publicly serve in the army.
They were also trying to apply for the Hawaiian court’s decision that could be initiated in gay marriage in that state. For fear of every country you may have to recognize unions of the same sex, Republicans have prompted the defense of the law of marriage, Known as Doma.
She announced marriage between one man and a woman, and allowed the states to refuse to recognize marriage. also Withholding federal benefits from husbands of the same sex. In 2013, part of Doma He found that he was unconstitutional.
It was always a wide approval. Democrats are like then. Biden Voice in favor of the bill. The current majority leader of the Senate Chuck Schumer, and many other Democrats who recognized them, were among the 342 who voted in favor of the bill in the House of Representatives.
Nancy Pelosi, the current chair of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi was among the 67 members of the “no” vote, along with the time. Steve Gonderson, who was at the time was only the Republican in the House of Representatives.
In 2004, Anti -gay adjustments to voting in the main states such as Ohio smart policy. George W. Bush has helped re -elect the White House and gain the Republican Party seats in the US Senate.
Bush supported a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage. The Democratic candidate, John Kerry, also opposed gay marriage at the time.
In 2008, Even when more in his party began to support equality publicly, Obama continued his opposition.
He recently said and wrote that he always supports gay marriage rights. His campaign assistant, David Axelrod, wrote that Obama made a decision calculated to oppose gay marriage.
“He accepted a lawyer than people like me, and has amended his position to support civil unions instead of marriage, which would designing a” sacred union. ”
In 2012, In the wake of President Biden’s progress at the time, Obama officially developed on this issue and said he has now supported equality in marriage. That was great A moment.
A few years later, in 2015, the Supreme Court ruled for gay marriage worldwide.
“I’m fine,” Trump said in 2016 during an interview with “60 minutes”.
He would continue to show off the hero of gay rights, although many LGBTQ activists would differ.
Politicians have evolved in the 1990s significantly with the country.
But this summer, Judge Clarence Thomas, one of the effects of the Supreme Court of the 1990s, asked the 2015 marriage decision that he opposed. As a result, Republicans and Democrats met again to retract what they did in 1996 and try to ensure marriage as a right for all Americans.