Search Giant Google is still facing a potential disintegration under President Trump’s administration.
On Friday, the Ministry of Justice confirmed a proposal that the court is forcing the technology company to sell its famous browser Chrome to restore competition.
The federal government applied last year after a federal judge ruled in a parametering case to combat monopoly, Google maintained an illegal monopoly to search for the Internet.
“The illegal Google behavior has created an economical Gallery, which causes ruin in the market to ensure that – regardless of what is happening – Google always wins. American consumers and companies suffer from Google’s behavior,” said the Ministry of Justice.
The revised proposal is left in place for most of the solutions suggested by the administration under the Biden Administration, where it was presented to Google, where it tries to retreat against separation.
“The proposals of the Comprehensive Ministry of Justice continue to bypass the court’s decision, and will harm US consumers, economies, and national security,” Google spokesman Peter Shotfelles said in a statement.
Mountain View, California, proposed in December the company restructuring its commercial contracts with manufacturers of mobile devices and wireless transport companies. Google also said she was planning to resume the anti -monopoly decision issued by Judge Amit Mihit from the US Provincial Court of Colombia.
The government said it wanted from Google stripping Chrome because doing this “will allow competing search engines to reach the browser that for many users a gate to the Internet.” The Ministry of Justice has also suggested other solutions, such as Google’s demand to display a “selection screen” on each Google browser when the user does not choose a virtual search engine.
The administration made some changes to its proposed solutions. For example, the government is no longer seeking the mandatory disposal of Google’s Amnesty International Investments.
Google and the government are scheduled to present their arguments about the proposed solutions before the court in April.