The Kenya Court says that the body of the British business is very degraded to determine the cause of death

Kenny judge says that the cause of the death of the British Harry Roy’s death, and his body was extracted in a morgue for 11 years, cannot be determined.

David has commanded Odhiabo to close the investigation, saying, “Because of the level [the body’s] The decomposition at the time of the extraction of the bodies – months after his burial, “It was very difficult to say what led to his death and” no one could call to answer any charge. “

Mr. Vevers died on Valentine’s Day 2013 in the coastal city of Mombasa. It was buried according to Islamic rituals and without death.

This led to a lengthy legal battle, with his two sons from a former marriage calling for an investigation of how their father died.

The sons of Richard and Philip, who were living in the United Kingdom, the second wife of their father, accused Azra Parvin Dean, and her daughters, Helen and Alexandra, of being involved in his death, so that they could inherit millions of dollars. They strongly denied any violations.

On Tuesday, Mr. Odhiambo has eliminated that due to the status of the commission and “conflicting reports by governmental and government chemists and other experts”, no charges can be made.

He added: “The investigations related to the death of the deceased are closed according to this unless the new information appears.”

The judge said that the body of Mr. Vever should be released from the morgue in Mombasa when paying the 11 -year -old fees.

But it is not clear that the body will be delivered because Mr. Odhiambo said that he could not make this decision and ordered both families to search for a directive from a different court.

At the time of Mr. Vever in 2013, his second wife, who was living with him in Mumbasa, said that her husband had died for natural reasons.

But his Islamic burial, which was done quickly after his death, raised doubts from his sons, who said that their father was not a Muslim and was buried under the name of false. They also claimed that their father had poisoned.

In January of last year, the Magistrate Court ruled that his death was not suspicious.

However, his children succeeded in challenging them in judging and seeking them to the Supreme Court to reopen and allow them to provide new evidence.

The Supreme Court referred the case to the Magistrate Court, noting the irregular procedures that lead to the initial ruling.

The tests after the bodies were extracted revealed the effects of pesticide pesticides, despite the difference in pathologists about whether this could be the cause of his death.

The ruling on Tuesday mentioned the results after the death, which found effects of a toxic substance on both the remains and soil in which his body was extracted.

But he was also cited “the conflicting results by governmental and chemists and other experts”, as a reason to keep pace with the cause of death “unknown.”

Additional reports by Anita Nicken in Nairobi