The Federal Judge suspends the approval of the Food and Drug Administration on MivePristone

Knowing that the issue of abortion pills was likely to cause general anger, KacSmaryk took unusual measures to maintain procedures under the winding: Details are usually released on federal court cases on a list available to the public. But at a phone conference with lawyers on March 10, Kaxmaaric said he would try to delay the announcement of the session until the night before. However, the Washington Post I learned of the invitation a day later, while giving the general warning from the next session.

During the session on March 15, according to Washington PostKacSmaryk seemed open to the allegations of the MivePristone group that could be harmful or even fatal, and that the approval of the Food and Drug Administration has been transferred.

“How many women do they die?” The lawyer for the IRIC IRIC Babtest, the lawyer for the IRIC Babtest, asked during the session, according to Avalache-Journal.

In fact, it explains the scientific evidence categorically MivePristone is safe. As of 2018, FDA data appears, 24 out of 3.7 million They died after taking MEFPPriston, although their death could not be categorically associated with drugs. The lawyers of the Ministry of Justice, who defended the Food and Drug Administration, said 99.9 % of MifePristone users have not shown any major side effects.

A prohibition on a drug accredited by the FDA-especially what is widely used for more than 20 years-will be an unprecedented decision. In recognition of this, KACSMARYK BAPTIST asked whether he was familiar with any other provisions that brought out a property on the market, according to Associated Press. The Baptist said that there was nothing, but he claimed that this was due to the previous challenges of “Stonewalling” in the medicine.

In a “normal world”, Lori CitinThe senior staff lawyer in the Reproductive Freedom Project of the American Civil Liberties Union told Buzzfeed News before the March 15 session, a lawsuit to combat abortion had been brought up from the beginning. She said the fact that it was not offers, as we entered “unlimited water.”

“What the prosecutors asked here is unprecedented,” said Chitin. “The courts simply do not jump and remove medicines from the market, especially those that were on the market [23 years]”

Before the arguments contained in the Texas case, the democratic -led states A lawsuit against the FDA In late February at the American Provincial Court of the Eastern Region in Washington. The complaint primarily asked the court to order the agency to remove an additional layer of restrictions imposed on the mavibestone. But it also sought to a judgment on the agency “to take any action to remove MivePristone from the market or reduce its availability.” On Friday, boycott judge Thomas Owen Rice, one of the species Barack ObamaHe did so completely, it was found that the initial gossip was in the public interest.

However, Rice wrote that the country’s al -Ziji matter in this case was “inappropriate”, referring to the competitive litigation in Texas.

Although it is still unclear how the Supreme Court will sort the differences in the two opinion, the effect of KacSmaryk is feeling at the country level – if it is permitted to effectively.

“Even in countries where abortion is legally, if it is a non -approved medicine, there may be legal repercussions to continue its prescription and certainly for the sponsors to continue to distribute it,” said Chitin.

David Mac and Stephanie K. contributed. Bayer reports in this story.

Leave a Comment