Sargement: And say everything is justified because of the emergency, but we will return to that. We had something similar in these two other cases. On customs duties, this time the Court of Appeal of the Federal Department has ruled, most of which are illegal. Trump has argued that he could call an economic emergency to cancel power lock to impose definitions unilaterally – and said that the relevant economic emergency was our trade deficit. After that, the court ruled that the statute concerned, which is the Economic Forces Act of International Emergency, does not grant Trump the authority of this unlimited tariff. Then at Harvard University, a federal boycott judge spent that the Trump government had broken the law when billions of dollars in research were frozen on the basis that Harvard had failed to do enough to fight and anti -Semitism. Lea, in both cases, the logical basis of Trump’s illegal works was frankly joke, and everyone knew that. Are you happy with the way the courts dealt with these two?
Litman: I must say I am very happy with the Harvard case. I am less happier than opinion on the tariff issue because the way the court resolved was not the issue of tariffs is to dive into this pretext in the event of an emergency. Instead, it was just a declaration that whether there was an emergency or not, the president only lacks the authority to create these definitions or these types of definitions. I believe that this skirts, as you say, is the main issue in this case and others, which is the prosecution and the basic hypothesis of nonsense. It creates a state of emergency to justify the powers of emergency. Therefore, I hope that the federal circle is ready to study this part of the challenge. Harvard’s opinion, I think, is the forces of the forces. It completely destroys, again, the suggestion of nonsense that this was about anti -Semitism. He, as the judge found, was just a highly hidden excuse for an ideological war on higher education and elite education.
Sargement: Let’s back down and note that, well, Trump has recently won the court, but these three losses – the law of enemies, definitions, and Harvard University – are truly three main pillars of the Trump business schedule. You have obtained collective deportations, the effort to raise the international trading order, and the strong weapon of the largest cultural institutions in this country. So, if you retreat, you can see how the large areas of Trump’s agenda are currently stabilizing at the top of huge violations of power and illegal actions. And this has not been revealed in a new way?