On the same day, like publishing the story, the university Investigate In Tessier-Lavigne’s research And the seven years of poorly detailed scientific behavior in Stanford Daily’s story.
“It was very amazing,” said Stanford Daily’s editor -in -chief. “I cannot say that I was expecting the Board of Trustees to act quickly.” But the launch of the investigation, said: “It has become just another news event for us.” Baker continued to cover the story, and revealed potential image processing in Additional papers Participated in his authored by Tayseer Lavin. He also reported the invitations of the President of the University to Stepping and Expanding the group of individuals Those who will be achieved in allegations of scientific misconduct. (You can read all the coverage of Stanford Daily here))
On February 17, three days before the announcement of the Polk Award winners, another Baker was published Huge story She revealed accusations that Tessier-Lavigne had failed to achieve public results of fake data in the 2009 sheet that identified a possible cause of the brain in Alzheimer’s patients (which was a great author).
Baker said his personal interaction with Tayseer Lavin was brief. He approached the university president shortly after sending an email requesting a comment on the story about the alleged cover -up of fake Alzheimer’s data. “I walked to him. I just said,” Hello “and said:” Yes, yes. You have received your message. I look forward to being in contact. I am in a hurry.
“I started saying something, and closed the door of his car in the middle of my penalty,” Baker continued. “Of course, he did not return to us. His lawyer did.”
Soon after the story of Alzheimer’s, Tessier-Lavigne sent a message to The faculty and employees of Stanford Attack the student paper reports, describing it “full of more”.
Tayseer Lavin’s speech reinforced Baker’s conviction that his stories would not have never been published if Stanford Daily was not an organization operating outside the control of the academic institution. (The paper celebrates the fiftieth anniversary of its independence from the university this year.) “The risks are very high,” Baker said. “The person we write is literally responsible for all of us.”
The Stanford Daily correspondent and editor -in -chief is ashamed of questions about the impact of their investigation on the facilitation period as the university president.
“We just want to report the facts and want to obtain them correctly. This is the most important for us,” said Catania. “As you know, whatever happens, if we were at the end of the day, we were accurate, we were accurate, and we were comprehensive. For me, that will be” the task “on the side of the daily.
For his part, Baker said he just wanted to reach “the bottom of what happened exactly.” He added: “I am trying not to think much about what will happen based on all this. The thing I spent thinking about most of the time is to make sure that we get it correctly, and make sure that we included what can be.