Senator John Kennedy (R-La) dismantled a radical left-wing law professor on her previous quotes and her tweets that were attacked by the United States’ constitution-and some of them.
Just as possible, Louisian, the evil wicked, was not well prepared to interrogate the professor of law in George Washington, the author of the book “” “Constitution worship“The radical activist Mary Ann FranksBut he did this with his moderate moderate style, with a little intelligence ejaculation in good condition.
Before we dig, it should be noted that between Mrs. Franx.Experience areas“Is it studying the first amendment and the second amendment law. This is in mind with the continued reading.
In a post on Tuesday afternoon to X (previously Twitter), with a video of Kennedy asking Franks, Senator Books:
This radical witness believes that “the majority of Americans hate women more than they love anything” and that the Supreme Court has supported an individual’s right to carry weapons because of the “white male superiority”.
Cool nausea.
How do not you like this man? Wait – I am sure you are doing.
This radical witness believes that “the majority of Americans hate women more than they love anything” and that the Supreme Court has supported an individual’s right to carry weapons because of the “white male superiority”.
Cool nausea. pic.twitter.com/jstbhilltk
– John Kennedy (Senjohnkennedy) March 25, 2025
Kennedy started reading several quotes from Franks.
Professor Franks, you listened to your testimony and a professor [Jonathan] Torley, so I got part of it. As I understand it, your position, Professor Franks is – I used the word “legend” – it is a legend that the Biden administration used the government to force the private discourse but the Trump administration He is Do this. Is this a fair description?
“Yes, that’s right,” Franks answered. Kennedy continued:
Do you think, perhaps, you allow your personal political beliefs to influence your objectivity, here?
“No,” Franks answered, continuous:
What is directing my answers here is that I look forward to knowing what the Supreme Court did. I noticed that in the testimony about censorship –
Kennedy cut it, saying he had only five minutes to interrogate her. He continued:
Your answer is “no”, and I appreciate that. Let me ask you two questions. I wrote an article to review the law in September 2023 on Bridge and Dobbs. In this article I said:
“Completely, these two cases have proven that the Supreme Court has adopted the use of the constitution as a tool for the racist Patriarchate.”
Did you say that?
“Yes,” Franks answered. Kennedy then read another previous price of Franks.
“When the Supreme Court declares that there is a constitutional right to defense armed self in public places, it adopts and promotes a culture that distinguishes the ability of the white man to exhaust and kill those who consider it threats.”
Have you read it correctly?
“I did. Thank you for reading it.” Franx answered.
Again, Kennedy Franx Transfer:
“By expanding the right of a white man simultaneously to kill and explain the right of women to not death, this Supreme Court has turned the constitution into the killing agreement as well.”
Did you write that?
Yes, of course I did, and recognized proudly.
Franks smiled and replied, “This looks like me.”
Shortly after the back, Franks remained arrogant and challenging all the time, and Kennedy quoted many of her previous tweets, including:
The majority of Americans Hate Women are more than they like anything, including democracy.
There is a reason that makes the Supreme Court dominated by conservatives the constitution as [it] It does not have the right to miscarriage. But it is convinced that it contains the right of an individual to possess firearms. This reason is the superiority of white males.
As Franks continued to become more challenging, Kennedy finally dismantled it:
This is what I am saying: “Cleaning nausea.”
However, the time of Senator Kennedy ended, but not even a completely unveiled Franks – which he referred to in a frustrating manner in the name of the “court officer” – as a left -wing radical activist.
Also read: Freedom of Expression College: Investigating the student to support Israel, views on the “Trance” athletes
Oh, the paradox! Professor UCLA, “The only hope” is the “violent” military coup by Trump
The bottom line
While Professor Mary Ann Franks may be relevant in a greater sense, it fundamentally represents a countdown to radical law professors who believe exactly as you think, who also do their extremist work in the legs, but also against US students in the United States.