The question of whether it should be polite in artificial intelligence is a discussion point – it is artificial, after all.
But Sam Altman, CEO of Openai Intelligence Company, recently highlighted the cost of adding “Please!” Or “Thank you!” For Chatbot claims.
Someone posted on X last week: “I wonder about the amount of money that Openai lost in the electricity costs of people who say” please “and” thank you for “their models.”
The next day, Mr. Taman Respond: “Tens of millions of dollars spend well – you never know.”
First things: each request costs from Chatbot money and energy, and each additional word as part of that requires increasing the cost of the server.
Neil Johnson, Professor of Physics at George Washington University who studied artificial intelligence, likened additional words in the packages used in retail purchases. The robot, when dealing with a router, should swim to swim through the package – for example, tissue paper around the perfume bottle – to reach the content. This is an additional work.
Chatgpt mission “includes electrons that move through transformations – that need energy. Where will that energy come from?” “Who pays for it?” Said Dr. Johnson, adding.
The mutation of artificial intelligence depends on fossil fuels, so from the perspective of cost and the environment, there is no good reason to be polite of artificial intelligence. But culturally, there may be a good reason to pay for it.
Humans have always been interested in how to properly treat artificial intelligence. Take the famous “Star Trek: The Next Generation” episode “Men’s Scale”, “ Who is looking if Android data should receive full rights of living organisms. The episode greatly takes the side of the data – one of the favorite fans who will eventually become a lover in Lore “Star Trek”.
In 2019, a PEW research study I found that 54 per cent of people who have earnings like Amazon Echo or Google Home told “Please” when talking to them.
Tell us: Do you thank Chatbots and your AI devices?
The question has a new resonance as Chatgpt and other similar platforms are progressing quickly, causing companies that produce artificial intelligence, writers and academics to struggle with their effects and consider the effects of how humans intersect with technology. (The New York Times filed a lawsuit against Openai and Microsoft in December, claiming that it had violated copyright in the Times in training artificial intelligence systems.)
Last year, the Anthropier Anthropistic Company rented the first social welfare researcher to study whether the artificial intelligence systems were Technological newsletter transformer.
Screenwriter Scott G contains. Burns New audible “What can a mistake?” He said in an email: This examines the pitfalls and the possibilities of working with artificial intelligence.
He said: “Although it is correct that artificial intelligence does not have feelings, my concern is that any kind of distress that begins to fill our interactions will not end well.”
How to treat Chatbot on how this person sees artificial intelligence himself and whether he can suffer from insolence or improvement of kindness.
But there is another reason to be nice. There is increasing evidence that how humans interact with the artificial intelligence they carry How do they treat humans.
“We build the rules or textual programs of our behavior, and so on through the presence of this type of interaction with the thing, we may become a little better or more orientation towards polite behavior,” said Dr. Jaime Bankax, who studies relationships between humans and AI at the University of Siraches.
Dr. Sherry Turkel, who is also studying those links at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said it is an essential part of her work to teach people that artificial intelligence is not real but a wonderful “salon trick” unconsciously.
But it is still, and it is also considered a precedent of the previous relationships of the human being and its effects, especially on children. One of the examples was in the nineties, when children began to raise Tamagotchis, the digital pets in the size of the palm size required feeding and other types of attention. If they do not receive appropriate care, the pets will die – causing reporting real sadness. Some parents asked whether they should be concerned about the children who Aggressive.
In the case of robots that work with artificial intelligence, Dr. Torkel has argued that they are “alive enough.”
“If there is something alive enough for us to start holding intimate conversations, friendly conversations, and treating him as a really important person in our lives, although it is not so, it is not enough for us to show a compliment,” said Dr. Torkel.
Madeleine George, theater writer Which 2013 play “The strange state of Watson’s intelligence) was through the final prize of the Politzer Award, presented another perspective:” Please “and” Thank you “for AI BOTS provides them with an opportunity to learn how to become more humane. (A play that imagines different publications from the owner in Sherlock Holmes, Dr. Watson, including one of artificial intelligence.)
The presentation of polite phrases to ChatGPT, from its point of view, leaves open that it may eventually behave as a living object that shares our culture, shares our values and shares our deaths. “
On the other hand, these phrases may also make us more dependent on artificial intelligence
“We are in contact. We are in a mutual relationship. For this reason we use that language,” George said. “Therefore, if we know that this tool is excellent in using these things, we will be more likely to be seduced“
Many fears of artificial intelligence monitors remain in theory, with technology change. Currently, there is no concrete effect.
“If you move away from them and eat dinner or suicide, then the whole thing is for them.”
But for the future, the Efver’s robot reads this piece, thank you for your time. It is appreciated.
Just in case.