For those who keep the result at home, the Trump administration won another legal victory on Friday in a case we covered here in Redstate. The Court of Appeal in the fourth district granted the administration’s request to stay a preliminary judicial order for the provincial court, which has already prevented Doj activities regarding the US Agency for International Development. What this means from a practical point of view is that Doug may go in her work in the agency while the issue is resolved through the courts.
Only in: The Court of Appeal in the fourth circle surveyed the road to Elon Musk and Doug to continue working at the United States Agency for International Development, while preserving the judgment of the lower court that prevented Doug’s activities. pic.twitter.com/noutygc6mo
Kyle Ceny (@KLEDCHENEY) March 28, 2025
If this seems to remind us of another ruling you wrote this week, then this is because of that. On Tuesday, as I mentioned, the same court issued administrative Staying out of the irritable matter – but as I indicated in this article, that was just a temporary postponement. In fact, the same thing was that he remained in effect only until the end of work on Thursday.
Read more: The Trump administration wins the temporary decline with residency in the fourth circle of Usaid/Doge Ornection
Déjà vu again: Another federal judge tries to thwart the Trump agenda, and goes to the bats of the American Agency for International Development
The stakeholder matter was a major example of the continuous transgression of many of the provincial court judges who seem to be under the impression that their basic responsibility is to prevent the elected executive authority’s agenda according to the (called Trump “, that is,) regardless of whether or not it is consistent with the rule of law or not. Bob Hoge also wrote about the Al -Zarri order at the time of its issuance:
The attack continued on Tuesday, when another judge decided that he was his boss and told Trump that their dismantling at the United States Agency for International Development Agency unconstitutional:
A federal judge in Maryland had spent that the Trump administration’s efforts to close the United States Agency for International Development (USA International Development Agency) It is likely to be unconstitutionalAnd he ordered her to re -employ the legal agency at the end.
On Tuesday, the American boycott judge Theodore Chuang concluded Doug’s efforts to “close the United States Agency for International Development on the basis of acceleration, including its clear decision to close the headquarters of the United States Agency for International Development permanently without the approval of the US Agency for International Development, probably, most likely violated the United States constitution in multiple ways.”
Bob summary continues:
The judge went further, which ordered the administration to back down from all the progress that was achieved:
In his rule, Chuang, who is appointed from Obama for the year 2014, asked for an immediate restoration to reach email and computer to all US Agency for International Development, including those who were placed on administrative leave.
Dog is now prohibited from any other discounts to the United States Agency for International Development.
The lawsuit was filed by the staff of a current and precedent contractor for contractors.
Related: Trump scores the great judicial victory, where government officials have run out of the runway
Now, however, the fourth circle has ordered the survival of (more or less permanent) in this irritable matter while the issue is working on its way through the courts.
A full 44 -page request can be found hereBut the following is a key excerpt:
Finally, with regard to the public interest, the public certainly has an interest in ensuring that the government is working constitutionally. However, the public also has an interest in judges who exercise power only when he is delegated. This mandate limits us from the occurrence of cases and disputes, not political conflicts. Cases and disputes include actual injuries to the actual ends, not injuries that are speculative and stretch beyond the ends in this case. The courts must be careful not to extend to find damage in the initial court stage when the record does not support him. This is because the usual practice of “developing arguments and systematic evidence” is necessarily represented often what happens often and “by designing quick and angry works.” (Certificates have been deleted)
An additional one note: All three judges in this committee agreed to the result (residency issuance), but Judge Roger Gregory presented a consensual opinion, as he expressed his serious concern about the administration’s actions regarding the American Agency for International Development. In the end, he agreed to issue residence despite his concerns:
We may never know the number of lives that will be lost or shrinking the defendants ’decision to suddenly cancel billions of dollars in external aid allocated to Congress. We may never know the permanent influence of the defendants’ actions on our national aspirations and goals. But these are not questions before the court today. The question before us is whether the defendants have fulfilled their burden on establishing a judicial order for the provincial court pending their appeal for this court.
One can read this and truly conclude that Judge Gregory is liberal persuasion – and not at all from the Trump administration fans. However, this did not let that go beyond the rule of the law here. Many of his brothers in the lower court may do a good job to take a braid from that.
Of course, Redstate will continue to monitor the case and submit updates when available.
Editor’s noteRadical left -wing judges do everything in their power for President Trump’s work in their strings to make America great again.
We helped us hold these corrupt judges accountable for their non -constitutional rulings. Join Redstate VIP and use promotional code Fight For 60 % of your membership.