Richard Glassb: The Supreme Court orders for a new trial for Akllahoma, Roma Prisoner Richard Glassib

CNN
–

Broken Supreme Court on Tuesday I ordered a new trial to remove Oklahoma for timeThe resumption of national interest and support from the conservative public prosecutor in the state, in light of the allegations that the state withheld evidence related to its main witness.

This ruling is a major victory for Glossip, whose condemnation was asked in 1998 by arranging the killing of Barry Van Trees, decisively, the state prosecutor after new evidence appeared in recent years.

The ruling represents an unusual development in the legal epic surrounding Glossip, which was scheduled to be implemented nine times and eaten its last meal only three times to keep his execution.

Judge Sonia Sotomoor wrote to the majority: “We conclude that the claim violated its constitutional commitment to correcting the wrong certificate,” Judge Sonia Sotomoor wrote to the majority.

In the midst of the appeal, the general prosecutors participating in the Glossip trial on Gustin Sinide, the man who killed Van Trez at Bisbul’s beater in a hotel. Although both sides agree that Sneed was already killed by Van Trez, Glossip was accused of organizing killing.

Glossip’s condemnation was based on a Sneed certificate, but after years of Glossip’s condemnation, the state revealed evidence that Sneed was treated for a serious psychological state. Notes indicate that the prosecutors were aware of the diagnosis and treatment of Sneed at the time of the Glossip trial, and according to GLOSIP supporters, he hid that information from his defense.

“If the prosecution corrected Sneed on the platform, his credibility would be clear Amicus, the jury had already known that it had been repeatedly lied to the police), but also that Sneed was on A willingness to lie to them under the section.

Five of the judges stood with Glossip on a new experience request. Two conservative judges, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alto. The conservative judge, Amy Kony Barrett, had brought the case to the minimum court for further consideration.

Thomas, who wrote in an opposition to which ALEO joined, argued the court’s decision, “imagining a constitutional violation as none of them occurred, and abandons the basic principles that govern” how federal courts review the decisions of the state court.

During the oral arguments in October, it seemed that many members of the court were confused from the small record surrounding the notes, including liberal justice, Kitanji Brown Jackson, who said at some point, “I understand that there was no decision of the court on any of these facts. , “And Aleto, who described the notes as” hidden. ”

It can be said that the Glossip case is the issue of the highest death penalty for the court for years, and it has attracted two of the country’s most lawyer. Seth Wakimman, a former lawyer, was on behalf of Glosp. Like Paul Clement, the Prosecutor of Oklahoma Gintner Dramund, a Republican who supports Glossip, a former lawyer.

Although Dromond called for a new trial, the Criminal Appeal Court of Aklaoma supported the penalty of a seed, as he ruled that the evidence was not discussed, had not changed the result of the case and that a lawyer knew that Sinide was taking Lithium.

However, Glassib’s lawyers argued that the prosecutors revealed the treatment of lithium and the correction of the lies that Sinid told on the platform of witnesses during the trial about his medical history.

This story was updated with additional details.