California’s best law enforcement official weighs the rule of the controversial US Supreme Court on Monday for migration enforcement.
Atty. General Rob Punta condemned the resolution, which expands the way for immigration agents to stop and question people who suspect in the United States illegally rely on information such as their perceived race or the place of employment.
Speaking at a press conference on Monday in the center of Los Angeles, Punta said that he agreed to the allegations that the American Civil Liberties Union had filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration. He called on the random tactics used to make immigration arrest a violation of the fourth amendment, which prohibits unreasonable searches and sources.
Punta said he believed that it is unconstitutional “for ice agents, federal immigration officers, the use of race, the inability to speak English, the site or the perceived profession … stopping, detention, search, and seize California.”
He also criticized what he described as the increasing accreditation of the Supreme Court on the emergency schedule, which he often obscured decisions.
He said: “It is disappointing.” “The emergency schedule has been used more and more. You often don’t know from a sound and how there is no argument. There is no written opinion.”
Punta called the opinion of Judge Brett M. Cavano is “very annoying”.
He argued with Trump’s specific justice because many people who do daily work in areas such as construction or agriculture, participating in such a work may be useful in helping migrant agents to identify the people who will stop.
Punta said that the practice was able to “use sweat for potential discrimination,” saying “it is annoying and worrying.”