On Friday, we learned that President Donald Trump authorized the Ministry of Internal Security to cancel the details of former Vice President Kamala Harris, which was extended by Joe Biden in the closing days of his presidency for a period of 12 months longer than the usual six months that the departing presidents gave.
“It has been allowed, according to this, to stop any security -related measures that I have already allowed the executive note, in addition to those required by law, for the next individual, as of September 1, 2025: former Vice President Kamala Dr. Harris,” Thursday note Read.
On the same day, we also learned that Harris would get protection from the California Highway patrol in an arrangement that was held after the governor of the state, Gavin New Zerou, and the mayor of Los Angeles Karen Bass, who was said to be “discussions” about what to do before the next Harris book “107 days”.
Read more: The state’s taxi guessing now on a hook after Trump cut off the secret service
Of course, the usual suspects rushed to jump into conclusions following the news of Trump’s message to the Ministry of National Security. Among them was the leader of the minority in the House of Representatives, Hakim Jeffrez (D-Ny), who announced that Trump’s behavior was “reckless” and that “these extremists are not valid for rule and dangerous to the American way of life.”
The Trump administration canceled the protection of the secret service of Vice President Kamala Harris.
Why do they do such a reckless thing?
Republicans are consumed psychologically with revenge.
These extremists are inappropriate for judgment and danger to the American way of life.
– Hakim Jeffres August 29, 2025
Senator Mike Lee Pay first With reference She got a longer month than the former vice president who was obtained by Mike Pines, and then inquired if Jeffrez condemned the Democrats in the House of Representatives who tried to obtain Trump’s secret security protection three months before the first assassination attempt:
Did the Democrats who tried to exclude the protection of Trump’s secret service last year required – while the presidential candidate of the Republican Party was? https://t.co/fvm3albg0
– Mike Lee (BASEDMIKELEEE) August 30, 2025
It was a story that she did not receive at that time, but MP Benny Thompson (D-MS), a member of the arrangement in the Parliament Committee for Internal Security, presented legislation in April 2024 Call Protecting the secret service must be taken “for those who were sentenced to prison after being convicted of federal or governmental surgery – which indicates that the prison authorities will be responsible for protecting all guests regardless of protecting the previous secret service.”
The draft law was entitled “Depriving the former Protection Law, very convicted, or former protection law (HR 8081).”
Eight of his colleagues in the House of Representatives Sponsorship IT: Reps. Troy A. Carter Sr. (LA), Barbara Lee (CA), Frederica Wilson (FL), YVETTE D. CLARKE (NY), Bonny Watson Coleman (NJ), Jasmine Crockett (TX), Joyce Beatty (OH), and Steve Cohen (TN).
As my colleague Becca Lieber indicated in her writing, there were concerns that we learned in the wake of the attempt to assassinate July 2024 on Trump:
It is getting worse: According to the secret service, Trump’s requests for more security refused
Shocking report: The Secret Service Resources converted from the Paerb Rally to Jill Biden, more anxious information
Also let us not forget that in July 2023, the then democratic presidential candidate Robert F. was rejected. Kennedy, the son, who was the Democrats to take support from Biden, details of the secret service via Biden DHS “Although the secret service determined in June was at the risk of harmful attention.”
Last and not another, there:
Therefore, Karen Bass did not have money to repair firefighters, but she had money to pay the price of security for the book of Kamala Harris’s book (private citizen) ???! Stop using our taxpayer money like PC!
Spencertertt August 30, 2025
I mean, if Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass managed to find money to finance the security of Kamala Harris, then why do they not find money to finance things related to public safety and security everyone California residents, like a 36th pillar?
Editor’s note: Do you enjoy the conservative Redstate reports that take the radical left and the media wake up? Support our work so that we can continue to bring the truth.
Join Redstate VIP and use promotional code Fight For 60 % of your VIP membership!