
What if elections were held and no one won?
Currently, Democrats are in a deep hole with them The lowest voting and registration decades While Republicans are contaminated by a leader with the worst presidential poll in history at this stage (and retreat).
Both are true, but they are absent from the largest direction line – the ruling party in Donald Trump is heading to the elections in 2026 and 2028 significantly against the defense.
Although it will not appear in any of the two voters, it will be asked for all the Republican running to justify their non -followed support for its non -popular failure: an economic slowdown resulting from customs tariffs, continued cover -up on Epstein, and the bombing of historical independence of weight, FBI, FBI, BLS, and homogeneous declines in brown people at night on TV.
Not to mention the rhythm of the elections outside the year that cost the party in power on average, 22 seats in the House of Representatives since 1970 (Democrats need three seats in the House of Representatives and four seats in the Senate to win a majority.)
BellWether’s competitions swollen in 2025 sharply for the benefit of Democrats (Like a legislative seat in Iowa last Tuesday). Many of the city hall meetings in the red areas have become screaming matches. The polling from January to August shows that Trump has decreased from 46 % to 29 % favorable among independents (Gallup) and 53 % to 31 % among voters who believe he is “honest and worthy of trust” (Yougov). Public Congress surveys currently show Democrats 3-5 points.
Trump’s response to Epstein was not the direct response, as in many previous scandals, resorted to dazzling withdrawal to control the “attention economy” – so the American forces sent blue cities to play in crime and sweat cards, and retreat between the military rocks that are disposed of between the military names. Niagra is one of the lies that have become a brand (sometimes with humor, such as telling his cabinet meeting, “I don’t have the ego when it comes to these things.”
However, none of the ribs that illuminate in Cheoryling reduces prices, strengthens real income or slows down the aggression of Russia – all of this ran in 2024. Worse, the national elections associated with the right track to be in the past versus the future, between his goal to make America 1898 again “and the Democrats promised to improve daily life.
The comment continues in the lecture of the Democrats, “They do something!” That is, not only anti -case, but with a unified theory that links both of them linking a large number of influences millions to join the movement of the birth of democracy.
So, here is one approach: the rehabilitation of the elections as a competition between “progress or retreat”-then building this issue by fighting corruption and creating an economy for all, and not just ethics “less than that” historians believe in the collapse of ancient Rome.
This is, frankly explains what they are against them and what you have in attention and vote. This means that there is a “national emergency” and that its beloved hosts in Fox, amateur billionaires and proud children in relationships. If Trump is able to run successfully against the great Joe Biden, who was not in voting, the next time Democrats can run against the Trump race more distorted unlike the amazing McKinley era.
***
- Fighting corruption by promoting democracy
The Trump Rap paper has raised his criminal convictions, court losses, sexual assaults and actual rebellion on January 6 – to a special level: it is now objectively the biggest public fraud since Charles Bonzi, who won a century ago with the rights of naming to become a avatar of fraud. It is possible that “overcoming” will not be a compliment.
This is not the right left but a right -wing contrast. A detailed analysis in the Atlantic Ocean has found that Trump had benefited personally from $ 3.4 billion since 2017 during his period in office; While Republican administrations from Nixon to Trump 206 of the total accusation regulations produced a similar extension of the Democratic Caliphs (Carter/Clinton/Obama/Biden) that led to only three trials.
Especially since it plays with a mitigation of the Ghislaine Maxwell series, will the Republican Party in Trump a political price for its narcissism and the yen that are not satisfied yesterday? It is assumed that after three wars fighting tyranny-against Britain, the Confederation and the Axis-the Americans prefer again our defective constitutional republic over the “dictator of half” only on the first day “(in addition to 222 days and count).
Here are four preliminary proposals that can submit this national story line:
- Ruling on power pardon.
The amnesty, which was established in Article Two, has spoiled Trump’s repeated allegations that the convictions were “very fair”, and from here the vast majority of them went to his friends, allies and former employees. “Do not leave any Maja behind him,” said Ed Martin, when he headed the amnesty staff.
Democrats can propose a law or, if necessary, a constitutional amendment to slow down the growth of what has become a new branch of the additional government.
- Check the loudspeaker of money.
the 2011 The majority of Roberts is in the United citizens Our elections were transferred into auctions, as if a $ 280 million donation from Elon Musk to Trump was just an example of speech by some SOAPBOX fiancé. The poll shows the popularity of the constitutional amendment to restrict such legal bribery that creates a government of politicians purchased.
- End political prosecutions.
The Ministry of Justice is following up issues against Obama, John Brennan, James Kumi, Tish James and ACT Blue. The presidents should not be allowed to order the prosecutors to destroy or exhaust the opposition party financially. This repeated revenge alone will replace the rule of law for America throughout the centuries of the Trump Law of Governance. (In the same manner, it is prohibited to use federal forces against the civilian population unless there is a real threat to rebellion, such as the whiskey rebellion in 1794 or the civil war in 1861.)
- Protecting freedom and speech.
The prohibition of abortion and books is not freedom. It also does not activate the huge force in the federal contract and licensing for control-if not self-censorship-universities’ discourse, law firms, major networks and national museums based on the definition of #47 of the American “exception”. All federal courts have ruled against the first amendment violations, but the liberal goals still feel pressure to undergo such federal extortion.
***
- Create an economy for everyone
How can Democrats explain their constant inability to elections on the economy when the growth of GDP was 50 % higher since 1962 compared to Republican presidents? In fact, of 43 million net jobs created since 1989, 96 % have been created under Democratic presidents.
Thirty years ago, the average salary of the executive director compared to linear workers was 30-1; Now 300: 1. Will the intermediate -income voters remain calm when, for example, goes to 1000 to 1 if the Free Foundation party reaches its way?
Many economic proposals can begin to enhance a meaningful slice of white working class voters as soon as they notice that the growing Delta between Trump’s joyful speech and their middle -class conflicts. For examples:
- Restore the social safety network.
The minimum federal wages was $ 7.25 per hour in 2009 and $ 7.25 today. The next president must suggest a gradual increase to $ 25 per hour so that blue collar workers are not poor if they work full time. Ditto with the creation of a parental leave program and the expansion of child tax credit, which would like millions of American families with young children.
according to Article 1 of the United States ConstitutioThe customs tariff can only be imposed by Congress, and not a president that it uses to try to dictate the economic terms of the rest of the world.
the The American International Trade Court was sentenced in MayThat was It was supported by the American Court of Appeal for the Federal Department on Friday. “The winners and losers who choose sovereignty – this is something that the seventeenth century King will do,” wrote Turkuler Isiksel, the political scene in Colombia.
Fifty years ago, two -thirds of federal revenues came from tax capital; Now it is a third. Instead, Warren Buffett served as super investments that ordinary workers in the company should not pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes from its CEO. In this process, Democrats can eventually bury the “flowing” Republican Party designed to hide the Republican Party’s policy of choosing our pockets to link them.
In the spirit of the ground collapse of the town of Zahran Mamdani, Democrats can defend a new TNEC (the “Provisional National Economic Committee”), as FDR and the head of anti -monopoly Thorman Arnold were identified in 1937.
***
Democrats seem to be patience with the main media that repeats the Trump hysteria about “Communists” while ignoring evidence of a confessed slow -moving fascism. Can it rise to this occasion?
It happened at least once before.
When President Harry Truman became in 1947 convinced that black soldiers returning from World War II were lacked equal rights, he tried to overcome the “separate but equal but equal” decision and nationalize white excellence in the federal employment established by President Wilson.
As described by historian Korean Britischeneider in his book “The Presidents and the People” in 2024, Truman restored the principles of civil war amendments by requesting a fair work policy throughout the federal government and ending the army.
After the Senate governors condemned it, the simple president wrote one ally that if he ended his support with civil rights “in my election of election, the failure will be in a good reason.”
It seems that the Truman Party after 80 years finally finds a new generation of “Give ‘Em Hell” to try to stir our devastating democracy from the grip of the Mar-Lago Mussolini. Recently, Gavin Newsom, JB Pritzker, Chris Murphy and Cory Boker were fighting fire with fire, in useful news, by overcoming the dangerous Trump extremism.

With the emergence of the boundaries of the Supreme Court that appears for fear of disturbing the elephant in the room-and the prominent White House press, he listens to a large extent to its own self-reference monologues-durability in Trumpbbe now depends on any party they really trust and be fine?
Trump or Truman? The destruction of America or the victory in America?
Green was the first public prosecutor in New York City, an author or editor of dozens of books, including transitional selections and three in Donald Trump’s record.