According to the texts of Defense Minister Beit Higseth, on March 15th, included information about the timing and location of the missile strikes scheduled to be held in SANA later that day.
“Time now (1144et): the weather is favorable. Just confirm with Centcom we go to launch the mission,” he wrote in one letter.
Next, “1215et: F-18s Launch (first strike package)” and “1345:” based on Trigger “F-18 Strike Window (Targetist terrorist is its well-known location, so it should be on time, with the launch of Strike Drones (MQ-9S)”, written.
However, in group chat, Higseth continued to leak sensitive information in another series of texts, explaining the timing of subsequent attacks, including “when the first bombs definitely decrease.”
“1410: More launch F-18S (Second strike package),” Books. “1415: hitting drones on the target (this is the time when the first bombs will definitely decrease, waiting for the previous” trigger “goals.”
“1536 F-18 2nd Strike begins-also, the tomahawks based on the sea based”, and “more to follow (for each timeline).”
“We are currently clean on OPSEC” – that is, operational security, although it is clear that it was not completely true, “Defense Minister added. “GodSpeed to fight us.”
“I will say a prayer for victory.”.
Mike Walz, Trump’s National Security Adviser is said to be responsible for unintentionally Atlantic OceanJeffrey Goldberg’s editor -in -chief sent a message to the conversation that some of the goals have been set in the collapse of the building.
“The construction of a vice president has collapsed.
Vans did not completely understand. “What?” He answered.
Soon after, continue. He wrote, “The first goal – the first goal – the upper missile man – had a positive identity for him as he was walking in his girlfriend’s building and now collapsed.”
A tour of the congratulatory texts came out, including “👊🇺🇸🔥”, now when asked whether the White House objected to the issuance of full texts, the press secretary Caroline Levitt sent the following statement: “As we mentioned over and over again, there was no information about it. [sic] Internal and private deliberations have been discussed among senior high -level employees and sensitive information. So for this reason [sic]- Yes, we object to the version. ”
Goldberg initially published details about the sensitive information discussed in the collective chat, leaving the newly released sections on concerns that “it was read by a deduction of the United States, which can be used to harm the American army and intelligence, especially in the broader Middle East, and the field of central responsibility.”
This story has been updated.