In his approval of the Supreme Court ruling 2022 in Dobbs V. Jackson Women’s Health That turned ROE V Resolution. WadeJudge Clarence Thomas surprised the left when he wrote that the court “must reconsider all the precedents of the legal procedures due in this court,” including Hodges V. ObergeFellWho effectively got married to the same sex in the country. Due to a legal appeal from the former Kentucky County writer Kim Davis, who was badly imprisoned, and his stature, then finished her role after she refused to issue marriage licenses for couples of the same sex because she violated her faith, Thomas may get his chance.
A report issued on Monday revealed that Davis’s legal representation presented a Seam As for CERTIORARI in July, the United States Supreme Court requested that it appeal the jury’s decision of $ 100,000 against emotional damage and $ 260,000 in legal expenses.
The petition puts an effect ObergeFell A decision in inspiring phrases, indicating directly to a precedent Dobbs Under, “the court’s decision is in ObergeFell– In the wrong imagination of due legal procedures – it is such a decision, and the error must be corrected. In fact, three of the five lawyers who talk[ed] To hold commissions that are allowed to resolve legal disputes “in 2015 and who is announced”[d]”The right to” has no basis in the constitution or the precedent of this court “is no longer assigned.”
The Davis Legal Team added, “ObergeFell It was “very wrong”, “deep harmful”, “outside the scope of any reasonable explanation for the various constitutional rulings that he referred to mysteriously,” and illuminated “in a cycle of collision with the constitution from the day it was decided.” 597 United States in 268. Moreover, ObergeFell’s The mistakes are not related to some of the mysterious angle of the law of the small importance of the American people, “but” raped the ability to address the issue of deep moral and social importance that the constitution leaves unambiguously to people. “
The impact of the judgment on Davis was taken directly.
“As expected at the time when ObergeFell decided, it threatens the religious freedom for many Americans who believe that marriage is a holy institution between one man and one woman.” As a result of this court’s change of the constitution, Davis found herself with a choice between her religious beliefs and its function.
In the petition, Davis’s lawyer quoted directly from Thomas who saw, “historical evidence indicates that” legal legal procedures “only require the executive and judicial actors to comply with legislative legislation and general law when depriving a person of life, freedom or property.” Adding that although “the condition of the legal procedures is mostly due at all a process”, “no, as it is assumed that the obligatory legal court cases, the government prevents the violation of some basic freedom interests at all, regardless of the involved process.”
They add it.[b]Ecuse does not guarantee the condition of legal procedures any essential rights, as it does not secure the right to do so [samesex marriage]Especially the right to obtain a marriage license of the same sex from a specific government official, regardless of the religious convictions of that individual. “
Nine states, including Idaho, Michigan, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota, Proposal Decisions to decline ObergeFell Four others, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Texas, called for a recognition of the “marriage of the covenant”, exclusively between a man and a woman.
Related: Gay marriage decreased in approval and I think we all know where to blame
The Supreme Court is in fact a long -term precedent used to expel religion from the public square
Despite a Gallup survey It was reported in May that 68 percent of American adults support homosexuals, and the question became more politicized than ever, with a low standard acceptance among Republicans by 41 percent barely compared to 88 percent of Democrats, a marked division of 47 points.
68 % of Americans support gay marriage.
The current 47 -point gap between Republicans and Democrats is the largest since Gallup first began to track this measure 29 years ago. pic.twitter.com/8jfqsvoteu
– Gallup (Gallup) May 29, 2025
according to ABC NewsThe American Davis can be the only one to have a legal status to bring such a case to the court. In 2025-2026 conditionAssistant judge Brett Cavano is responsible for the Court of Appeal in the Sixth Circle and the Hugs of Certiorari from Kentucky. Cavano joined the decision in Dobbs It was delivered by Judge Samuel Alto, agreed. His compatible opinion can cast some light on his possibility, such as Thomas, the judge ObergeFell On its dependence on due legal procedures, and emphasize the neutrality of the court on moral issues.
He wrote: “The court’s decision today properly brings the court back to the position of judicial neutrality on the issue of abortion, and properly restores the authority of the people to resolve the issue of abortion through the democratic autonomy operations set by the constitution.”
Although it is impossible to predict Cavano’s decision to grant Certiorari, his willingness to hear the case seems likely. In particular, when he remembers his words: “Certainly, many Americans will differ with the court’s decision today. This will be true regardless of how the court’s decision is this case. Both sides in the abortion case believe in sincerity and passion for the rightness of their case. Especially in those difficult and risky circumstances, the court must accurately abide by the constitutional re -place in the case.
The US constitution is silent on marriage as is the case in miscarriage. Therefore, Judge Thomas may actually have an opportunity to reprimand the due legal procedures again and re -marry the gay marriage to the states and the people.
Editor’s noteDo you enjoy the conservative Redstate reports that take on the radical left and the media woke up? Support our work so that we can continue to bring the truth.
Join Redstate VIP and use promotional code Fight For 60 % of your VIP membership!