JD Vance gives the best cause of the reason that military strikes against contestants in drugs are legitimate – Redstate

Vice President JD Vance has gone the controversy surrounding President Trump’s decision to destroy the drug shipment using military force. President Trump announced on Tuesday that the US military had carried out a strike on the Treen de Aragawa boat in international waters. This is a noticeable transformation from the old method of obtaining a suspect in the coast suspects in support of the US Navy. This decision was developed after the Trump administration announced a foreign terrorist organization equally with al -Qaeda or ISIS. Since then, many people who have been concerned have claimed what I think is an idol for “international law” and “standards” that Trump is guilty of death.






Related to:

Shots launched! The US military drowns Venezuelan drug runner (Hadith) – Redstate

Trump’s attack on the “illegal” drug cartel and “killing” according to very smart people – Redstate


The discussion is still raging, but it is a unilateral discussion with the absence of anyone-with the exception of drug gangs-with attention to what is the supportive side of smuggling Saying.

Two US government officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that the justification of Higseth – who was called “completely uncommon” – may crystallize after the attack.

Experts said that the logical basis of Higshith was weak, if not comic. “Trin de Aragua, who was appointed as a foreign terrorist organization is to name local law enforcement. It does not provide any army authority to use fatal force,” said Todd Hintley, who was a lawyer in active service for more than 23 years. “Under international law, there is no way approaching this legitimate use of force.”

And more than smart people insist that Trump cannot do what he did because the appropriate lawyers in the appropriate organization did not do so He depends.

The army I am the lawyers they have Legal and responsibility authority To provide independent legal advice without interference. Trump is trying to suggest otherwise. To attack the drug ship, what is the dominant legal advice provided, and who wrote legal opinion? What is the military advice provided on the legitimacy of this process, and was it rejected by the Supreme officials of the Ministry of Justice?





I love it when the legal military lawyers cite right “To provide independent legal advice to leaders” without considering that there is no legal condition for any person to give flying mice about their advice.

In this hot chaos, JD VANCE fought today without fear.

I agree. I have never understood the reason for allowing us to deal with drugs drugs by the oceans and the cycle on the stage across the border, and I insisted on treating it such as the case of law enforcement instead of threatening national security.

He faced a challenge among all people, Brian Krasinstein. Half of Krasinstein’s twins, who were online pests, who raided their home by the FBI and exported $ 450,000 in a fraudulent income.

Vans returned with the killing snapshot.

Perhaps this is the administration’s response to all questions about hitting drug contestants.

You can hear almost Krasenstein wandering in helpless anger while trying to return.





“Exposing US officials to responsibility” Who?


Redstate is your main source of news and opinions on management, politics, culture and conservatism. If you are appreciating our reports and comments, please think to become a member and support our efforts. Use the promotion code Fight For 60 % of your membership.



Leave a Comment