Janine Peru can not accuse pork sandwich, and Harvard gets a victory

Injustice to everyone It is a weekly chain on how to try Trump’s administration to arm the judicial system – and people fighting.


The veteran in Fox News is still unable to accuse pork sandwiches or anything else

It should now be clear that Janine Peru does not spend an interesting time in her new role as an American lawyer in Colombia. While Head Talking Fox News is supposed to be at the top of a campaign of glorious crime, putting these elite residents of the capital in their place, the major jury bodies do not simply cooperate. She was not able to do so Securing an indictment Against a person who claimed to threaten to kill Donald Trump, perhaps because it was clear that the person was only Drunk and RambleneG.

This is the seventh time at least that the Grand Compliance Authority refused to restore the accusation regulations presented by the Peruvian office. This is a truly amazing character when you learn that from 2009-2010, for example, there were more than 160,000 cases presented by Federal Public Prosecutors Indignation In 11 cases. Even when Peru can obtain the defendant in the courtroom, it is Do not go well, With the federal reconciliation judge, he says that one of the searches that Peru believed was “Dandy” undoubted Fighting with Five gallons water bottles. It may be more fast for her.

“The defendants used anti -Semitism as a smoke of the targeted assault, which he moves ideologically on the leading universities in this country.”

These are our words, Judge Jaksa, province, Alison Buroz, in their fire 84 opinion page The Trump administration has ordered the cancellation of $ 2.6 billion in the research funds that were illegally obscured by Harvard University. Borruz was not withdrawn from the absence of punches, considering that research discounts were revenge, and not imposed due to any alleged sublime anti -Harvard, but because of Harvard You will not confuse you To management.

Although it is a pleasure to see Buroz affecting the administration down, it is pleasure to realize that it needs to be clarified that it also knows that the danger that the prosecutors face in standing before the administration and how the lower courts are committed to standing firm:

Now, the task of the courts has become to escalate the same, and to act in protecting academic freedom and freedom of expression as required in the constitution, and to ensure that important research is not properly exposed to the end of arbitrary and procedural grants, even if it risks the anger of the government committed to its agenda, it does not matter the cost.

Real move words should not be forced to write.

Is it time for Alina Habba 2.0?

Just two weeks ago, a federal judge Ruling Alina Haba was not legally in her job as an American lawyer for the boycott of New Jersey and not since July 1. It turns out that the complex series of temporary dates and resignation that the Trump administration was lost together was not legal.

Now it is Siggal Chatah. Like habba, only Chattah Comment on The American lawyer in Nevada thanks to the patented administration, “What can we do to avoid this person’s confirmation by the Senate?” road. Chatah is now facing the same challenge that Haba faced, as the criminal defendants ask the court to reject their accusations. Because if you are not in fact the American lawyer, you cannot accuse someone. To determine whether Chata is legally in its role, it requires the same analysis that the court made over Habba, and this did not go well for Habba, he did so now?

Chatah says she is targeted because she knows “where all bodies are buried”, but it may be really because she says things like any judicial decisions. It does not agree with It is part of the deep state plot. While such a position, which makes it very attractive to President Donald Trump, it is generally not considered a useful experience for the best prosecutor in the state.

Trump appoints a madness that his colleagues will not ignore a precedent to the Supreme Court to give Trump what he wants

On Tuesday, a committee of three judges from the Capital Court of Appeal Ruling 2-1 that Trump made the repeter of the Federal Trade Commissioner, and returned it to this position. The Appeal Court did not really have a choice, because the Supreme Court did not turn Humphrey, the executor against the United States90 -year -old ruling literally says that the president cannot launch the FTC Commissioner for no reason.

However, it must be completely unbearable to follow an intermediary court that is subject to the provisions of the Supreme Court this ruling. However, the conservatives at the highest court were playing a game on the shadow schedule, as they allowed Trump to launch Trump who wanted him without saying that they were fluctuating Humphrey. This puts the minimum courts in a bond of link angry With her colleagues because they should pretend that the issue no longer exists and goes with feelings from the shadow schedule.

Certainly, Rao admits that “the employee that was removed here is the Commissioner of the Federal Trade Committee, and the Supreme Court has supported the removal restrictions of these commissioners in Humphrey port,“But the government must go on its way for reasons … It is supposed to be a major light for conservative thinking, but it is truly in court to ensure that Trump gets his way, and does not think that this requires any justification.

You know what is the real presidential transgression? Giving children Wi -Fi is better.

The head of the Federal Communications Committee, Brendan Carr, is trying to kill two Biden era programs who put the Wi-Fi network on school buses and hot points at community sites such as libraries. Why? because Those programs “In a clear violation of the borders imposed on Congress on the authority of the Federal Communications Committee.”

Ah, I got it. So when Trump, for example, shoots independent commissioners and shutters, this is a necessary and natural practice and a season of presidential power.

Reaching Wi-Fi is better for students, especially those who may have a suburb or not accessed at home, is a brutal transcendence. Oh, and also, which makes it easy for children to get a Wi-Fi network to perform their homework, not “the semester or the legal library”.

salary.

Leave a Comment