The Ministry of Justice has tried to delete one of its own studies that show that most of the local terrorism committed by the right ones, and it seems that, as you know, on the Internet.
Some time after September 12, “What NIJ’s research tells us about local terrorism“A report from the National Institute for Justice in the Ministry of Justice, Quietly From the Ministry of Justice website.
Well, yes. This thing cannot be suspended now, can we?
Once it is clear that the alleged Charlie Kerk killer is not defined permanently as a long -term anti -terrorist, George Soros, had the right to turn the tactics a little. The impressive motives of the actual accused murderer, Tyler RobinsonHe was ignored aside until people loved Gul Stephen Miller the bone appearance He can blame The book is the great, dangerous left.
Therefore, in the true Keystone Kops costumes, the Ministry of Justice decided six reports, saying very conclusively, hoping that no one noticed.
You can see why they want to cover this, with conclusions such as: “Actually, the number of extreme right -wing attacks continues to exceed all other types of terrorism and the extremism of domestic violence. Since 1990, extremist extremists have committed more than 520 roles that have more than 520 years. The ideological motivated attacks that took 78 lives.”
Oh, come on. This only indicates that the right that has committed nearly five times the attacks and took almost the lives of approximately six times. Really, really. Just an approximation error.
The Ministry of Justice really does not seem to have thought of the fact that people can still get to study through a Wayback machine. Heck, this is the place that Daily Cos got for piece Last week.
The Trump administration’s actions, as usual, are the full clown, but it is not without a precedent. One thing that the system needs success is to control the flow of information. This is a large part of Trump Judicial cases Against the main media and The desire for a coup New York Times against SullivanThe media provides a level of protection against people’s attacks like Trump. See also Peter Thil Funding the attack That gave Gawker from work.
But non -profit distributed entities cannot be easy to litigate because there is no giant pile of corporate money to reach them. So in these cases, it seems that the government will enter to care for this, with the Republican Party at home The launch of the investigation From Wikipedia editors only last month to bias the alleged with it, I guessed it, anti -Semitism as a kidnapper.
This is the fig paper, and everyone knows it. The conservatives were angry at Wikipedia because of his flexibility in facing their propaganda efforts, such as when Elon Musk spent the 2024 elections Launching very clear attacks On the alleged website, “anti -preservation”.
Wayback machine He was keeping Government pages such a study have disappeared since Trump began removing government websites, and will continue to commemorate things like this – at least until Trump discovers a way to close them illegally.
But even this will not make the study disappear. It is on the Internet, so it is forever.