
In 1863, an enthusiastic young inventor in New York City spotted A Newspaper advertisements It would change the course of material history. The notice offered a $10,000 prize to anyone who could invent a substitute for ivory in billiard balls. Play Pool was a fun activity at the time, but the demand for ivory was already straining elephant collections. Enter the 26-year-old John Wesley’s Life. He was already experimenting with a synthetic derivative of cellulose nitrate, and took on the challenge of creating faux ivory.
Building on previous work English inventor Alexander ParkesHyatt used the rules of photographic film to reproduce the look and feel of ivory. By the 1870s, his company was manufacturing a wide range of goods—from combs to piano keys—bringing what had previously been luxury items into the reach of the masses. The ads even claimed that the new material was “saving elephants.” At the time, ivory was prized for giving billiard balls their ideal weight, roll, and bounce, but one elephant’s tusks yielded only four or five high-quality balls. Businessmen worry that growing demand for the expensive, temperamental material may soon outstrip elephant supplies.
kinescopeAs the wonder-of-life material became known, it carried its own quirks. It was wonderfully versatile, easily hardened into things that mimicked ivory, tortoiseshell, or coral—but it was also flammable. Newspapers and memoirs of the era circulated stories of rain that very quickly soaked into curling irons, or billiard balls that cracked with gunshot when struck directly. The same quality that made celluloid so flexible also made it volatile, a reminder that even the first plastic was as much alchemy as it was dangerous.
Plastic as a conservation success
When plastic first entered the scene, it was celebrated as a breakthrough in conservation. Early plastics were positioned as solutions to scarcity and as durable, affordable alternatives to wood, shell, and bone.
World War II The turning point was marked From plastic as a novelty to necessity. The previously specialized material suddenly became indispensable to the war effort: lightweight nylon for parachutes, Plexiglas for aircraft windows, polyethylene for radar insulation.
The necessity of war prompted rapid innovation, increased production and diversification of applications. By the end of the war, plastics had established themselves not only as alternatives to rarer natural materials, but as superior in strength, durability, and cost. This momentum only carried in peacetime. In the mid-20th century, plastics became central to packaging, fashion, and household goods, accelerating a culture of convenience and disposability. As global bans on ivory and other natural materials continue, plastic has become the unquestioned default.

A world of so much waste
Over time, the same qualities that made plastic revolutionary have also fueled its transformation into one of the planet’s most widespread pollutants. What began as a clever material solution and a nod toward conservation thinking would evolve into a cornerstone of modern consumer culture over the next hundred years.
says Melissa Valente, director of communications for… Behind the plastic. “It was supposed to be a great thing, because comfort was a luxury. It was something that only the wealthy could have, and now the middle class was able to spend more time with family. It was seen as this great substance, until people started noticing all the pollution on their streets and in their waterways.”
Companies, wary of being to blame for the growing waste crisis, have turned to a new strategy: shifting blame. Industry coalitions poured millions into glossy advertising campaigns, convincing the public that the real issue was not mass production but individual behavior—that if people simply recycled more, the problem would go away.
This embrace of the culture of disposability was deliberate. Advertisements from the 1950s and 1960s have families celebrating with plates and cups in the air, touting the “single-use” marvel. Comfort was marketed as freedom from drudgery, a symbol of modernity.
But companies were already realizing that recycling alone couldn’t keep up with the rising tides. By the 1970s, internal industry documents revealed what many scientists already suspected: recycling would never be enough.
“The documents exposed this fact, but companies were worried about their pockets,” says Valliant. “And that’s why we’re here in 2025 with a massive plastic pollution crisis.”
This crisis is driven by an unprecedented increase in production. Since 1950, plastic manufacturing has increased more than 200-fold, and is expected to nearly triple by 2060, exceeding 1 billion tons annually.
The result is a world covered in waste. Researchers estimate that more than 8 billion tons of plastic have now accumulated all over the planet – from the summit of Mount Everest to the deepest ocean trench. Today, residue is everywhere: microplastics in the oceans, in the soil, in the food we eat, and in our bloodstream.

Cost of convenience
Although plastic may look low-cost on the shelf, its actual price is staggering. Researchers estimate that plastic is responsible for at least… $1.5 trillion in health-related damage each year worldwide. more than It is known that 16,000 chemicals are used in…or unintentionally in, plastic.
Scientists have linked it to plastic Cancer chemicals, nervous system damage, hormone disruption, fertility issues, And now it has increased Risk of heart attack, stroke and premature death. One recent study He points out that the average human brain now harbors as much mass made of plastic as a plastic spoon. Exposure begins early, as microplastics and nanoplastics have been detected in newborns.
“Basically, humans are now pre-born,” Valliant notes. “It’s absolutely worrying – and there’s a lot we don’t even know. My view is that plastic and associated chemicals like lead: we may not fully realize the extent of the problem until it’s too late.”
[ Related: Plastic makers lied about recycling for decades. What do we do next? ]
The costs are not borne equally. Valliant points out that while companies often defend their reliance on plastic by calling it affordable, the claim ignores hidden costs. She points out that black and low-income communities live near plastic production sites Bear the brunt of pollution Through higher medical bills and chronic health issues. Ultimately, Valliant adds, the health consequences extend to everyone, no matter where they live.
“There is another paradox,” Valliant notes. “As taxpayers, we’re the ones who foot the bill for cleaning up all this plastic waste. It’s not the companies that produce it — it’s the United States. We pay for the transport, the recycling, the upcycling, the incineration, all of it.”
But “there is reason for hope.”
Around the world, governments are starting to clamp down on unnecessary single-use plastics, from bags and straws to foam containers and hotel page bottles, while some are taking legal action against companies that make them.
“Individuals should not underestimate their power when it comes to instigating these types of changes,” Valliant continues. “Their voice and activism can be the catalyst for their organization or community’s disposal practices. Beyond Plastic has some clues to help.” Restaurantsand Dry cleaning workand Programs like Meals on Wheels Move away from single-use plastic and towards safer options for people and the environment. “
At the same time, scientists are looking for more solutions: a study published today in the journal Nature Communications Detailing a new type of plastic made from bamboo that rivals traditional plastics in strength and durabilityHowever, it biodegrades in the soil within 50 days. The material can be recycled in a closed loop while retaining most of its original strength, suggesting a potential leap toward truly sustainable design.
Along with the growing shift towards reusing refillable systems in communities and businesses, Valliant highlighted that the solutions to the plastic crisis do not lie in any single material, but in the collective imagination of building a different kind of future. One that learns from plastic’s past and reclaims what it was meant to offer: innovation in the service of the planet, not at its expense.