


Meat, dairy and sugar implanted in the laboratory can be for sale in the United Kingdom for human consumption for the first time in two years, sooner than expected.
Food Standards Agency (FSA) is looking at how to accelerate the process of approveing foods planted with the laboratory.
These products are planted from cells in small chemical plants.
UK companies have led the road in this field scientifically, but they feel that they were subjected to current regulations.
Dog food is made of meat that has grown in the factory basins It was sold in the United Kingdom for the first time last month.
In 2020, Singapore became the first country to allow the sale of meat planted with cells for human consumption, followed by the United States after three years and Israel last year.
However, Italy and the American states in Alabama and Florida have had a ban.
FSA develops new regulations by working with high -tech food experts and academic researchers.
She says she aims to complete the full safety evaluation of two laboratory foods during the two -year process that she started.
But critics say that the presence of companies involved in setting new rules is a conflict of interests.
The initiative benefits from fears of UK companies by losing the land in front of competition abroad, as approvals take half of the time.
Professor Robin May, the chief scientist in FSA, told BBC News that there will be no compromise on the safety of the consumer.
“We are working closely with the relevant companies and academic groups to work together to design a useful organizational structure for them, but at any cost that ensures that the safety of these products remains as high as possible,” he said.
But critics like Pat Thomas, the campaign’s group manager behind General Motors, are not convinced of this approach.
She said: “The companies participating in helping FSA to put these regulations are likely to benefit from canceling the restrictions, and if this is another type of food products, we will get angry with that.”

The Minister of Science, Lord Vallasa, took a case with the process that was described as “canceling the restrictions.”
“It is not the abolition of organizational restrictions, it is a supportive organization,” BBC News told BBC News.
“It is an important discrimination, because we are trying to comply with the regulations with the needs of innovation and reduce some bureaucracy and duplication.”
Foods planted in the laboratory are grown into vegetable or animal tissues from small cells. This may sometimes include the release of genes to adjust food properties. The subsidized benefits are that they are better for the environment and perhaps more healthier.
The government is keen to flourish the food companies planted by the laboratory because it hopes that it can create new job opportunities and economic growth.
The UK is good in science, but the current approvals process is much slower than other countries. Singapore, the United States and Israel in particular have faster measures.
Ivy Farm Technologies in Oxford is ready to go with laboratory meat slices, made of cells taken from Wagyu and Aberdeen Angus.
The company applied for approval to sell meat slices to restaurants at the beginning of last year. Dr. Harsh Amin, CEO of IVY FARM, explained that two years were a very long time to wait.
“If we can shorten this to less than a year, while maintaining the highest food safety standards in Britain, this would help startups like our companies with prosperity.”

Dr. Alicia Graham has a similar story. By working at the Imperial College, the Bezos Center in London in West London, I found a way to develop an alternative to sugar. It involves inserting a gene in the berries into the yeast. This process enables her to produce large quantities of crystals that make them taste sweet.
She says this does not make you fat, and therefore it is a possible local and a healthy alternative in soft drinks.
In this case, I am allowed to taste it. It was incredibly sweet, slightly sour and fruits, and reminds me of shyrtet lemon. But Dr. Graham, MadesWet, is not allowed to sell it until you get approval.
“The road to obtaining approval is not clear,” she told me.
“They are all new technologies, which are not easy for the regulator to keep up with. But this means that we do not have a specific way to agree to the product, and this is what we would like.”
FSA says it will complete a full safety assessment of foods for two laboratory foods during the next two years and has the beginnings of a faster and better system for approvals applications on new foods that are cultivated.
Professor May from FSA says that the purpose of working with experts from relevant companies and academics is to obtain science properly.
“It can be very complicated, and it is important to understand science to ensure that foods are safe before declaring them.”
But Mrs. Thomas says that these high -tech foods may not be environmentally friendly as they are made because they require energy to make them and that their health benefits in some cases.
He said: “The foods that laboratories are ultimately cultivated are ultra -treated foods and we are in an era in which we try to make people eat fewer foods that are very treated because they have health effects.”
“It should be noted that these ultra -treated foods were not in the human diet before.”
