
Members of the ICE and Customs response team (ICE) explains how the team enters a residence in the pursuit of a required topic in federal law enforcement training centers (FLETC) in Bronzwek, Georgia on Thursday, August 21, 2025.
Fran Roshlski/father
Hide the explanatory name
Switch the explanatory name
Fran Roshlski/father
WASHINGTON – A federal judge temporarily prevented the Trump administration from performing rapid deportations of non -documented immigrants held in the interior of the United States.
This step is a setback for the efforts of the Republican administration to expand the use of the federal expedited removal law to remove some immigrants in the country illegally without appearing before the judge first.

President Donald Trump promised a huge deportation engineer during his 2024 campaign if the voters returned to the White House. He set a goal in carrying out a million deportations annually in his second term.
However, the American boycott judge, Jia Cope in Washington, DC, suggested that the expanded Use of the expedited Trump administration for immigrants tramples the rights of individuals.
“Upon defending this narrow process, the government provides a truly amazing argument: that those who entered the country illegally are not entitled to the fifth amendment, but instead it must accept anything that Grace Congress provides,” wrote a cup in an opinion of 48 pages issued on Friday night. “If this is true, not only citizens, but everyone will be in danger.”
The Ministry of Internal Security announced shortly after Trump reached his post in January of expanding the use of rapid removal and deporting the rapid path of illegal immigrants who were in the United States less than two years.
The effort raised the lawsuits by the American Civil Liberties Union and immigrant rights groups.
Before the Trump administration’s batch to expand the rapid deportation, only the expedited removal of migrants who were stopped 100 miles from the border were used in the United States for less than 14 days.

COP, one of those appointed to former President Joe Biden, did not question the constitutionality of the expedited removal law, or its application to the borders.
“It is only important that when the statute is applied to a huge group of people who live in the interior of the country who have not previously been subjected to rapid removal, the government must bear their costs,” he wrote.
CoB, earlier this month, agreed to temporarily prevent the Trump administration’s efforts to expand the rapid deportations of migrants who entered the United States law in light of a process known as the humanitarian and humanitarian release-a ruling that could benefit hundreds of thousands of people.
In this case, the judge said that internal security exceeded his legal authority in his efforts to expand the expedited removal of many immigrants. The judge said that these immigrants are facing the risk of any harm from “noticeable stopping” over the administration’s plans.
Since May, American immigration and customs enforcement employees have put themselves in the corridors to arrest people after judges have accepted government requests to reject deportation cases. After arrest, the government renews the deportation procedures, but under the speed of the rapid track.
Although rapid deportations can be suspended by submitting asylum, people may be unaware of this right, and even if they are, it can be removed quickly if they fail to examine a preliminary.