The press schools know that the book must report the news, not He is News. But what happens when one of your articles is going viral – not for its content, but how to swallow AI Dohickey what you wrote and a controversial beauty?
Welcome to my weekly.
On February 25, the Times was published column About a hundred anniversary when the voters kicked four members of Ko Clox Klan of the city council. Many readers have dispensed with asserting that I was not surprised that there was no attention to the anniversary of the anniversary. More than a few insisted that KKK in Orange County was not as bad as in the south, which was OC’s response I was not thinking of the second.
No, the real fun began on Monday, when the Times launched visions. It is an artificial tool resulting from intelligence that reviews the article to discourage the place where the article is assumed to the political spectrum. (My Klan Piece, for example?
This feature also provides a summary of a bullet point, alternative views, and related links from the Internet via the Internet, including articles, columns and other news reports.
The other modern columns obtained the “left center” and “center” and even “Yameen Center”. I still miss the “right” on Lotion card.
In a letter to readers who present this feature, the owner of La Times, Dr. Patrick Sonit Sonit, wrote that he believed that “providing more various views supports our press mission and will help readers to move on the issues facing this nation.”
Well, it didn’t take long for one of Mr. Insights, well, visions to make people see the red color.
He said that the association with the articles criticizing KKK: “Local historical accounts are sometimes framing Clan in the twenties of the twentieth century as a producer of” White Protestant Culture “that responds to societal changes instead of an explicitly movement that depends on hate, Reducing his ideological threat.”
For me, so put a pin on this phrase because it is important.
The titles soon started:
It took just a day for the new AI tool for La Times to sympathize with KKK.
La Times pulls the new AI tool from the article after you defend KKK.
The new AI’s sympathy for La Times with KKK.
And on it and went on it. Some of the articles book either raised the phrase “reducing its ideological threat” or seemed to be claiming that it is not present. But this part of the sentence is very important: it shows that many people in Orange County have historically reduced the dangers of KKK.
Perhaps the tool of artificial intelligence was guilty of mysterious and vast formulation, but it did no Defense or sympathy for KKK.
Journalists love to complain that critics of their articles do not read after the title. Well, this was a case of journalists who did not read after the first item of the sentence.
In fact, as I indicated on X, this quote was correct. In fact, Amnesty International has been shocked by such a decisive point. But I was also annoyed that two other bullet points – including one associated with one of My eyes in 2018 About Klan in OC – was violently out of context, but no one else was interested.
Either way, friends began sending text messages to me to stories from local and national outlets within hours of the appearance of the online column claiming that the artificial intelligence tool used by the explicit Times supported KKK. Some readers announced that they were canceling their times, saying that they did not want to support their money, somehow, giving the Klean’s thumb.
Related visions, very long dismantling from my country column Some people caused the conclusion that it was underestimating the KKK atrocity.
But to announce it literally, he supported the hate group?
Only one correspondent arrived at me as a boundary writer who sparked AI Klan-Gate. My opinion was delightfully and free of artificial intelligence for all arrivals.
As a journalist, I hope that my contemporaries who reported the situation a little more accurate in describing the language they saw on the feature. The clear effect was to make it seemed that the artificial intelligence tool has practically burned a cross to show its support for KKK on a column who explicitly denounced the invisible empire.
They were more suspended on the AI tool in the Times, not the actual press that preceded it, which makes me think they have not read my pillar. Thanks, friends!
As for the readers who said that canceling their subscriptions was a way to offer their anger at times to use visions, here is the thing: you must press a button to turn on the thing. Like the comments section, you can handle it or not. You can only choose to read what humans say – criticize or include them. Why, if you ignore artificial intelligence Pedichad Sufficiently, digital football can pick up and return home.
If there is a silver lining for any of this, I may be a prophet. In December, I expected that whatever the Amnesty International program in Los Angeles Times will end up using it to cut opinion, it would weaken the moment it faced.
You must be counted as a Lotion Square, right?