Covid Inquiry said,

At least one NHS confidence was placed in its place “no consistency” for patients with patients in the epidemic, and he heard Covid.

This means that individuals were considered unpredictable to save life, only on the basis of age or disability, without individual assessment.

Professor Jonathan Willie, the former head of the UK’s recovery council, said he knows one confidence that implements politics, although he has not seen a document determined.

The groups representing the families of the people who died because of Kofid said they were “terrified but not surprised.”

Under NHS guidelines, the DNCR’s cardiac resuscitation matter cannot be added to the medical notes of a post -consultation with the patient or his family members.

This means that the medical staff will not try to press chest or fibrillation, as an electric shock is applied to restore the natural heart rhythm, if the patient’s heart stops or breathing.

Only 15-20 % of those who have CPR in the hospital survive, with success rates to 5-10 % outside a hospital.

The groups representing the bereaved families believe that some hospital departments are soaked in the epidemic so that the dnacpr bases have been applied, based on age, disability or medical condition only.

at that time , The Charity Foundation said Some people with learning difficulties have not been reported that they will not be revived if they have Covid.

NHS England says the dnacpr base is a blanket for every person who suffers from a specific medical condition or over a certain age will be illegal.

He – she He wrote to NHS Trusts several times during the epidemicTo remind doctors, applications must be applied only with “appropriate approval”.

Professor Waili told the investigation that he had not seen a document from the NHS Fund in question, but he heard about politics from a member of the Reservation Council.

Then the charitable institution, which evolves the guidelines and training of medical employees, issued a “very clear” public statement that DNACPR orders “are not a suitable way to move forward and should not be implemented.”

Professor Willie added, “This was our position and has never changed,” added Professor Willie.

The broken Covid-19 families for Justice UK said that the use of comprehensive policies would be “an unacceptable evidence”, and some NHS services were flooded in the epidemic.

“The investigation has heard over and over again from those in the summit that DNACPRS was not appropriate and that there was no direction in his place,” the group told the group.

“For a long time, the bereaved families have known that the facts on the ground were completely different.

“Their worst concerns have now been confirmed, but this brings more questions,” if this happens in this confidence, did this happen in the confidence in my loved ones? “