The Conservative Party will aim to “increase the extraction” of oil and gas in the North Sea if it wins energy, and it is expected that Kimi Badnosh will announce.
Badnosh will use a letter in Aberdeen in the coming days to develop its plans to extract as much oil and gas as possible instead of moving away from fossil fuels, according to the Sunday Telegraph newspaper.
It will announce the conservative plan to reform the North Sea Transport Authority, which oversees the issuance of licenses, dropping the word transmission and replacing its 12 -page mandate with a simple matter to extract the possible maximum of fossil fuels.
Badenosh said Britain “could not do everything to remove hydrocarbons from Earth” to enhance growth.
She said: “We are in the ridiculous situation, where our country leaves vital, non -exploited resources, while neighbors like Norway from the sea bottom itself.
“Britain has already hindered more than every other major economy since 1990, yet we face some of the highest energy prices in the developed world.
“This is not sustainable and cannot continue. For this reason, I call the time in this act unilaterally from economic disarmament and the impossible work ideology of the zero network by 2050.
Therefore, the future conservative government will cancel all the mandate for the North Sea, in addition to increasing extraction.
“It is time because proper logic, economic growth and national interest came first, and the conservatives will only provide it. We will leave all oil and gas from the North Sea.”
Last month, Energy Secretary and Safi Zero, Ed Miliband, accused the conservatives of being “hostile to science” by giving up a political consensus on zero.
After promoting the newsletter
In the first thing that promised to be an annual report “Climate Climate”, the Labor MP identified the results of a study led by the MET, which separates how the UK was hotter and moisturizing, and facing more harsh air events.
Meliband quoted former Prime Minister Theresa May, who set zero goals in law in 2019, and he argued that the real climate fanatics were “populists who only make easy answers to complex questions.” He added: “I could not put it better on myself.”