On Saturday, a developer used the AI index for the race game project achieved an unexpected barrier when the programming assistant suddenly refused to continue generating the code, rather than providing some unwanted job advice.
According to Error report In the official forum of Cursor, after producing nearly 750 to 800 lines of code (what the user calls “Locs”), AI’s assistant stopped the work and presented a rejection message: “I cannot create a code for you, because that may complete your work.
The artificial intelligence not only stopped its rejection – it offered a patriarchal justification for its decision, saying that “generating a symbol of others can lead to dependency and reduce learning opportunities.”
The index, which was launched in 2024, is The code editor that works in your root Building on large exterior language models (LLMS) similar to those that operate Chatbots AI, such as the GPT-4O from Openai and Claude 3.7. It provides features such as completing code, interpretation, reconstruction, and generating full functions based on natural language descriptions, and has become a common speed among many software developers. The company offers a professional version that outwardly provides improved potential and larger boundaries of the code.
The developer who faced this refusal, which was published under the username “Janswist”, expressed his frustration with hitting this restriction after “1 hour of coding” with the experimental version of the professionals. The developer wrote: “I am not sure if LLMS knows what it is (LOL), but it does not matter as much as I cannot pass over 800 LOC,” the developer wrote. “Anyone has a similar problem? It is really specific at this stage and arrived here after only 1 hour of coding.”
One member in the forum to reply“I haven’t seen anything like that, I have 3 files with 1500+ LOC at my code base (I am still waiting for a boot) and has never experienced such a thing.”
The sudden rejection of Cursor AI is an exciting development in the rise of “full coding” – a term formulated by Andrej Karpathy, which describes when developers use artificial intelligence tools to create a symbol based on natural language descriptions without fully understanding how they work. Although the coding of priority gives priority to speed and experimentation by making users simply describe what they want and accept artificial intelligence suggestions, it appears that the response of the philosophical philosophy of Cursor directly challenges the “based on feelings” that is not efforts.