Anger grows on a new law that opens the door to destroy the country’s natural lands on a large scale: “This is anxiety”

Specialists are afraid to maintain that the change in Peruvian law will lead to irreparable damage to the country’s rainforests.

What is happening?

Peruvian wildlife law and wildlife law requires in 2011 environmental studies and government approval before any change in forest lands, such as The Associated Press mentioned.

This law has been weakened in recent years, according to news service. The amendment approved in March now allows land owners and companies to exceed this approval and even makes the removal of previous forests legally legal.

Supporters say change will give farmers in Peru and agricultural companies more economic opportunities. Critics believe that it will effectively privatize the Amazon rain forests – which the constitution says is public, national lands – that give a selective Blanche to remove forests.

Alvaro Maskiz Salvador, a lawyer at the Peruvian Defense Institute, said, “Alvaro Maskiz Salvador, a lawyer at the Peruvian Defense Institute, said,”

Why is the Amazon important?

More than 60 % From the lands of Peru are covered with tropical forests, almost all of them are the Amazon rainforests, according to the rain forests in the United States. It has the fourth largest amount of rainforest in any country, and only Brazil has more Amazon lands.

First, the Amazon and other rainforests are very important for the indigenous population of their societies and ways of life, as I noticed.

The rainforest also plays a vital role in our environment, as the trees absorb the heat besieged gases, release oxygen, and help keep the planet’s cold.

Amazon, in particular, is home to 10 % of the world’s known species. But experts say that the removal of forests, like what is now permitted under the Peruvian law, has led to a “turning point.”

What is done to protect the Amazon?

Lawyers have already made challenges for this amendment. The Peruvian Constitutional Court said that the original societies should have been consulted before changing the law, but it still supports most of the amendment, for each AP. It is worth noting, supported the part that declares the effects of forest removal in the past.

The court recognizes that the law violated the rights of the indigenous population [tribes] Environmental lawyer Cesar Eibnza told news service:

The international court’s challenges are expected to come in a recent attempt to protect not only the Amazon but also the indigenous people who call it home.

As for the actions, individuals can take it, we can Keep awareness On the issues involved in the Amazon – and to speak Where we see a need.

Join the free newsletter Good news and Useful tipsAnd do not miss This wonderful list In easy ways to help yourself with the help of the planet.



Leave a Comment