King Charles has stripped Megan Markle from her titles after the Royal Royal Protocol, especially after the royal family presented a major example.
The Duchess of Sussex recently launched Netflix, with Love, Meghan, and promotes it along with its long -awaited launch of the lifestyle brand, as it was always.
Although Megan stepped down from her upper royal position in 2020 with Prince Harry, she continued to use her titles, which was granted by Queen Elizabeth in 2018.
In the promotional offers of her brand, Megan repeated that she is “Megan Sussex” now. In one of her cooking chain episodes, Megan is correctly corrected by Pal Mindy Caling, which she referred to as “Megan Markle”.
Moreover, in the last step, the Duchess that launched a new fashion site chose to use the first letters of the URL, which was “MS” and not “MM”.
All these projects have nothing to do with the royal family. While the royal family has not taken any action against Megan, the British royal family has a new example that the Swedish royal family has developed.
Officially known as The House of Bernadotte, the Swedish family did not avoid traditions even when Royal Blood came when it started its “private” work.
Princess Madeleine, the youngest child of King Karl XVI Gustav and Queen Silvia, announced that she is scheduled to launch a new skin care line, developed in cooperation with the Swiss skin care giant, WEEDA.
However, I noticed that as this is a “special initiative”, it will not use its royal title for that.
Moreover, Palace also participated that “the decision to start the company was taken in a dialogue with the royal stadium.
“Since the new business is private and is not related to the princess’s position at the royal house, the princess will use the name Madeleine Bernadot in the contexts of work,” the Swedish Royal Reading Statement.
It is not sure how King Charles or the King of the Future, Prince William will interact with this new precedent, which was already placed in place during the era of the late Queen.
There are clear instructions mentioned in Section 4 (1) of the 1994 trademark law, which states that no member can use the royal badge or addresses for commercial use.
The section provides for:
“A brand consisting of or containing –
(A) Royal weapons, or any of the main bearings of royal weapons, or almost any badge or device that resemble royal weapons or any potential bearing is likely to be wrong for them or,,
(B) Representing the royal crown or any of the royal flags,
(C) Representing Her Majesty or any member of the royal family, or any color tradition, or
(D) It is not permissible to register the words, messages, or devices that are likely to lead people to believe that the applicant either has either or was recently registered with a royal care or license, unless it appears to the registrar that the approval has been submitted before or on behalf of His Majesty the King or, as it may be the matter, the relevant member in the royal family. “