Washington – President Trump’s lawyers urged the Supreme Court on Monday to prevent the order of the judge who requires the government to “rehabilitate” the rehabilitation of 16,000 federal employees.
in Emergency CallThey argued that the American boycott judge, William Alsup in San Francisco, had no legal authority to guess the decisions of administration employees.
The appeal is the first to ask the Supreme Court to inspect the aggressive management plan to reduce the federal workforce.
“The matter of returning the extraordinary judge violates the separation of powers, and trains in one local court, the authorities of the executive branch of employee management on the most severe and most beautiful causes of time. This is not a means of government management,” said the lawyer, Acting General Sarah Harris.
She said that the Court of Appeal in the ninth district of the United States has not yet ruled regarding the administration’s appeal of the judge’s order, and asked the Supreme Court to put the judge’s order, at least temporarily.
Although federal employees have legal rights as civilian employees, these rights have proven that they are largely ineffective in fighting workers on a large scale.
Unions representing tens of thousands of federal employees in late January, but their lawsuits were submitted on the basis that the Civil Service Law requires employees to file their complaints with an administrative agency in the government.
The Supreme Court said this is the exclusive way to such claims.
As an option to reserve, Alsup, one of those appointed to President Clinton, was martyred by demands from people who depend on the service of the national park or the affairs of old warriors, defense, energy, agriculture, interior and treasury.
Speaking in the courtroom, he ordered these agencies to “provide any re -test and all the test staff in or about 13 and 14 February 2025.”
Harris did not describe what the administration did to comply with the arrangement.
She said that the Supreme Court “should not allow a single local court to control the review of federal employees’ decisions.”
Judges may ask a response from lawyers who filed a lawsuit in San Francisco.