As part of the investigation, the Marshal office, which is usually responsible for mostly responsible for guaranteeing the security of the judges, conducted 126 interviews with 97 court employees, and concluded that 82 of them managed to reach the draft, in addition to the nine judges. However, the investigation focused mainly on staff such as law writers or other employees, instead of judges.
(Judge Stephen Prayer was still on the field at the time, as he was not yet replaced by Judge Kitanji Brown Jackson).
In the follow -up statement last week, Marshall Gil said. Corley does not think it is necessary to ask the judges to sign specific certificates, as it was required of other court workers.
“During the investigation, I spoke with both the judges, several on multiple occasions,” said Corley. “The judges were actively cooperating in this repetitive process, asking questions and answering me. I have followed all reliable expected clients, none of which were the judges or their husbands.”
The letter highlighted the court to restore the interest that was directed towards Judge Alto after a New York Times report From November, it revealed that a former antigenant leader had learned the results of another decision from Alto-Agalal in 2014 before his public launch after he dealt with his friends with justice and his wife. The LIPUTON-Lubet message to the legislators asked whether Alito has been interrogated on this issue for the year 2014 and whether his contacts with anti-abortion activists have been studied.
“Supreme Court staff will be subject to a wide range of penalties, including ending employment and damage to future professional prospects, if it turns out that they have misled Marshal. In contrast, judges have life dates and it is actually impossible to remove them from his position,” he wrote Lipton Labbet.
Why, then, Marshal thought that the additional threat of legal danger was necessary to ensure sincere cooperation by court employees, while refusing to subject the judges to the same legal weakness? ” Lipton Labe added.
Durbin and Jordan representatives did not respond to the suspension requests.
Jordan, which took control of its committee when the Republicans gained a gentle majority in the House of Representatives in the mid -term elections in November, that he wanted to hold hearings on other issues related to the FBI, immigrants crossing the border with Mexico, and the President Joe BidenStore the documents classified in his own home.
But Representative Daril Issa, a Republican in California and a member of the committee, indicated that he wanted more scrutiny.
“The Supreme Court leak has not been closed,” Issa, Issa He said on Twitter Last week. “Congress must investigate in an appropriate and comprehensive way.”