Sargement: It is funny to put this because we have examples now from the Trump administration that is likely to violate the orders of the court. On other limits, Trump called for the law of foreign enemies in 1798 to accelerate deportations, but a federal judge had already prevented this because, to excessive To call this thing. However, what is if the administration fails to request aircraft carrying migrants to wrap and return after the judge ordered this. Matt, can you walk through this piece?
Celgman: Yes. I will only present this by saying the facts on the ground here about what was happening in the courtroom, what was happening on the list, and what was happening in the air is very complicated, to some extent, in a dispute. But what happened is that there was an emergency session in Washington, DC, before a federal judge, Judge Boasberg, who is very respected and is the chief judge in the provincial court in Washington, DC, which was brought by the American Civil Liberties Union in that morning on Saturday. During the session, the judge Pasperj issued an order Saying that the government cannot deport anyone, or remove any person in the technical language, according to this declaration that President Trump signed a day before calling the law of foreign enemies. This was released at some time like 6:30 or 6:40 pm during the session, and it was not until about 7:30 of that evening, there was a written order that appeared on the list.
This is very common because [in] Oral listening sessions, The judge will make a decision and then issue a written order that he will [their decisions]. Now, there were some discussions today that oral orders are not legally valid, that is, in light and absolute words. Of course they are good. So what the government now claims …. and they exchange – and different people in the government say a little different things – but the best I can say It is that the general position of the administration is that for technical reasons related to when the planes were exactly in the air, and when the requests were issued, it did not actually violate it, but they could.