When the Georgia State University professor J. Soo Casson teaching a new path this summer, I used obstetric intelligence to help a brainstorm.
Casson, Professor of Language, Culture and Education, teaches current and future linguistic teachers. GEMINI – Chatbot from Google AI – used to find ideas for readings and activities for a course on integrating identity and culture into language teaching.
“There were suggestions about providing different options such as students’ presence to create a picture, and to make students write a poem. These are the things that I may think about but we have limits in our time, which may be our most valuable supplier as faculty members.”
Kasun also uses Gemini to create grades forms. She says she is always checking to make sure that what he generates is accurate “and it is important that my learning goals be.”
She says this huge savior is time.
Kasun is one of the increasing number of faculty members in higher education using obstetric intelligence models in their work.
one National survey Among more than 1,800 higher education employees conducted by Tyton Partners at Tyton Partners earlier this year, about 40 % of officials and 30 % of the instructions were found using daily or weekly artificial intelligence – this rises from 2 % and 4 %, respectively, in the spring of 2023.
New search From Anthropor – the company is behind Ai Chatbot Clade – that professors worldwide use artificial intelligence to develop curricula, lessons design, research conducting, writing grant suggestions, budget management, student work classification, and their interactive learning tools design, among other uses.
“When we looked at the data late last year, we saw that among all the ways that Claude used to use, the form of education is among the first four cases of use,” says Drew Bint, educational bullets in Anthropor and one of the researchers who led the study.
It includes both students and professors. Bint says that these results inspired a report on How University students use Chatbot Amnesty International And the latest research on the use of Professor Claude.
How professors use artificial intelligence
Anthropor’s report depends on nearly 74,000 talks that had users who had email -education email addresses with Claude over 11 days in late May and early June this year. The company used an automatic conversation tool.
The majority – or 57 % of the analyzed conversations – are related to the development of curricula, such as designing lessons and duties plans. Bint says that one of the most surprising results was the professors who used Claude to develop interactive simulations for students, such as web -based games.
“It helps in writing the code so that you can get an interactive simulation that you can share with students in your class to help understand the concept.”
The second method was the most common for professors who used Claude to academic research – this consisted of 13 % of the conversations. Teachers also used Chatbot, Amnesty International to complete administrative tasks, including budget plans, formulate recommendation messages and create meeting schedules.
Their analysis indicates that professors tend to automate more arduous and routine work, including financial and administrative tasks.
Bint says: “But for other areas such as teaching and the design of the lesson, it was a much more cooperative process, as the teachers and artificial intelligence assistant go back and forth and cooperate on it,” says Bint.
Data comes with warnings – Antarbur Its results were published But the full data behind them – including the number of professors who were in the analysis.
And the research captured a shot in a timely manner; The period that was studied included the end of the tail for the academic year. A girl says, if they analyzed a 11 -day period in October, for example, the results would have been different.
Classification of the student of work with artificial intelligence
About 7 % of the human analyzes on the classification of student work.
“When artificial intelligence teachers use degrees, they often automate a lot of it, and they have Amnesty International, large parts of grades,” says a girl.
The company has a partnership with the North Eston University in this research – surveying 22 faculty members about how and why they use Claude. In their responses to the investigation, faculty members at the university said that the work student’s work was the task that Chatbot was the least effective in.
It is not clear whether any of the assessments produced by Claude have been taken into account in the grades and comments that students received.
However, Mark Watskins, a lecturer and researcher at the University of Mississippi, fears that the results of the anthropologist indicate an annoying direction. Watskins study the effect of artificial intelligence on higher education.
“This type of nightmare scenario that we may face is students who use artificial intelligence to write papers and teachers who use artificial intelligence to classify the papers itself. If this is the case, what is the purpose of education?”
Watskins says he is also concerned about using artificial intelligence in ways he says, reducing the value of the relationships between the professor and the student.
He says: “If you only use this to automate part of your life, whether it is writing emails for students, letters of recommendation, grades, or observations, I am really against that,” he says.
Professors and faculty members need instructions
Kasun – Professor of Georgia – It is also not believed that professors should use the artificial intelligence of the degrees.
She hopes that colleges and universities will receive more support and guidance on the best way to use this new technology.
“We are here, somewhat in the forest, and we defend ourselves,” Casson says.
Drew Bint says, with Antarbur, Companies like his partner With higher education institutions. He warns: “We, as a technical company, tell the teachers what they must do or what should not be done is not the right path.”
But teachers and artificial intelligence, such as bent, agree that the decisions that have now been made about how artificial intelligence in college and university courses will affect students for years to come.