How many court cases can Trump lose in one week?

Is Donald Trump tired so far from all the loss? During the past week alone, Federal judges in all parts of the country rejected some of the most important and long-term Trump initiatives-from his efforts to reshape the global economy with definitions and mobilize the army to act as a police in American cities to re-spend billions of dollars in funds allocated to Congress. The president continues to cite the non -existing emergency situations to justify his executive transcendence, and the judges continued to summon him, and issued a hardness in the tradition of Judge Bayril Hawj, who, during the case of this spring, observed the extinguishing of civilian employees, that “the American president is not a king – and not even one of them.”

I am not sure that the epic loss series for this week may have received the attention it deserves, which undoubtedly is that America has other things that worry about it, such as whether Trump is already alive, despite all Internet rumors. He speaks to the present moment that the president is still with us a lot, but has already started raising money outside the madness of the social media surrounding his supposed death during the Labor Day. (“These rumors are nothing but another desperate attack from the failed left, which cannot stand as we are profitable!”

In fact, the first autumn president of his second term enters his position with my historical a little Approval categories – the only president to have worse signs at this stage was Trump himself, in his first term – and a radical a business schedule whose fate has not yet been determined. I realize that this is not currently the dominant narration about Trump 2.0, which, whether you liked or hated, was generally covered as an amazing and amazing attack on the columns of the American Foundation inside and outside the government. However, based on how to run the next few months, it may be the case. This is the point: What is clear from the first seven months of Trump in power is that he started a breathtaking effort to reshape the American presidency. What is far from apparent yet is whether and to what extent will he succeed.

The latest series of defeats began last Friday, when the US Court of Appeal for the Federal Department ruled that the so -called mutual definitions impose duties of two numbers on the main commercial partners such as Canada, China and the European Union illegal. During the weekend, the federal boycott judge intervened to prevent immigrant children from deporting to Guatemala while some of them have already loaded on aircraft. On Tuesday, the US Court of Appeal of the Capital Department re -commercially re -commercially, saying that Trump had no power to shoot it. On that day, another federal judge spent that in sending hundreds of National Guard employees to Los Angeles amid protests against the Trump immigration campaign, the President violated a law in the nineteenth century that prohibits the use of forces for local law enforcement purposes. On Wednesday, another judge, in Boston, rejected billions of dollars in financing discounts for Harvard University, which is part of a widespread war on the liberal academic circles that Trump achieved an unlikely axis in his second term. Late Wednesday night, a federal judge in Washington banned billions of dollars in the discounts that Trump requested to foreign aid, saying that he had paved the power of Congress to refuse to spend money. This, I must add, is an incomplete menu. If there is nothing else, this shows the extraordinary range and the size of the battles chosen by Trump Follow-up-there can be no strategic view of the presidency as much as seeing everything-everything-everything at all for the presidential power that has not been examined.

Important caveats, of course, applies that all of this age to Trump can turn at the appeal; The September loss chain may soon become a winning series next spring, especially with the Tram’s Supreme Court, which, in the first few months after Trump’s return, failed to verify many of Trump’s initial abuses, and it is certain that it encourages him to pay further and faster to apply his favorite constitutional theory, what I can call “I can do anything I want.” Indeed, this week, Trump has appealed the ruling of the customs tariff before the Supreme Court, and asked for an urgent review in a case not only testing the legitimacy of his favorite economic performance but his extensive assurances of the emergency authority to overcome constitutional restrictions. In the case of foreign aid, the American boycott judge Amir Ali He explained that his word will not be the last in this regard, expecting “specific guidelines for the Supreme Court” in view of the “legal and enormous practical importance” surrounding the issue of whether the president can simply decide the laws of allocations of Congress.

There is also a question of the damage that Trump has already caused, even if he has eventually lost some of these cases or even all these cases – the lives cannot save, and families are divided into harsh immigration policies, companies that disrupted or disrupted supply chains by the demands of one man. So let’s say that winning the loss may be a great result in Trump; When destroying things is the goal, the more destroyed, the better, whether the rulers agreed in the end or not.

Leave a Comment