Health practitioners, companies and others for years have praised the potential benefits of Amnesty International in medicine, to improve medical photography to doctors in diagnostic assessments. The transformational technology is even predicted by artificial intelligence lovers in one day that helps find a “cancer treatment”.
But a new study found that doctors who used artificial intelligence regularly became less skilled in months.
The study, published on Wednesday in The science of the digestive system of forgetting and liver science magazineI found that for six months, doctors became exaggerated in the recommendations of artificial intelligence and became “less enthusiastic, less focused and less responsible when making cognitive decisions without the assistance of Amnesty International.”
It is the latest study to show possible negative results on artificial intelligence users. A previous study conducted by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found that Chatgpt has eroded critical thinking skills.
How did the study conducted
In all European institutions, the researchers conducted a study based on the use of four endoscopy centers in Poland that participated in artificial intelligence in colonoscopy to prevent cancer (AcceptTrial. The study was funded by the European Commission and the Japanese Association for the Evidence of Science.
As part of the experiment, the centers provided Amnesty International tools to detect good-growing tumors that could be benign or cancerous-in late 2021. The study looked at 1443 non-auxiliary colon among a total of 2,177 colon conducted between September 2021 and March 2022.
The researchers compared the quality of colonoscopy that took place three months and three months after the implementation of artificial intelligence. I colon endoscopy either with or without the help of Amnesty International, randomly. Among those without the assistance of Amnesty International, 795 were performed before the use of artificial intelligence regularly and 648 were performed after the introduction of artificial intelligence tools.
I did not find the study
Three months before the introduction of artificial intelligence, the average detection of a benign tumor (ADR) was about 28 %. Three months after the introduction of artificial intelligence, the rate decreased to 22 % when doctors were not prepared by artificial intelligence. ADR is a commonly used quality index for colon endoscope Representation “The colon endoscopy examination is carried out by a doctor who discovers at least from the benign colon and rectal tumor or at least glandular cancer.” Glandular tumors are the growth of cancers, and AdR is higherly associated with a lower risk of colon and rectum cancer.
The study found that artificial intelligence helped theorizing in detection when used, but once help was removed, doctors were worse in detection.
The researchers attributed it to the “natural human tendency to excessive dependence” on the recommendations of decision support systems such as artificial intelligence.
“Imagine that you want to travel anywhere, and you are unable to use Google Maps,” said Marcin Romańczyk, co -author of the study and assistant professor at the University of Celsea Medical University, said MedPage today. “We call it the effect of Google Maps. We try to reach somewhere, and it is impossible to use a regular map. It works very similar.”
The repercussions of the study
Omar Ahmed, a consultant of the digestive system specialist at the University University Hospital in London, who wrote an editorial besides the study, but did not participate in its research, was likely that exposure to intercepting the visual habits of doctors of artificial intelligence and alerting the look patterns, which are important to detect good tumors.
“On its essence, dependence on the discovery of artificial intelligence may lead to the recognition of human patterns,” says Ahmed. He adds that the regular use of Amnesty International can “reduce diagnostic confidence” when withdrawing artificial intelligence, or that the skill of endoscopic scientists can be reduced.
In the comments on Scientific Media Center (SMC), “Although removing tremors caused by the use of artificial intelligence was raised as a theoretical danger in previous studies, this study is the first to provide data in the real world that may indicate the abolition of AI’s defeat in the artificial in diagnostic tribes,” said Catherine Menon, the main lecture in the Department of Computer Science at the University of Hirtfsfachire. Menon raised concerns that excessive dependence on artificial intelligence may leave health practitioners at the risk of technological settlement.
Other experts are more careful about extracting conclusions from one study.
Vinite Athani, a professor of clinical artificial intelligence and machine learning at Queen Mary University in London, indicated that the total colon endoscopy-including AI-AI-SARISCED and uninterrupted-has been clarified throughout the study. Athani suggested that increasing the work burden could have led to the tiredness of doctors and the poorest discovery rates.
Alan Taker, a professor of artificial intelligence at the University of Bronel in London, also noted that with the help of Amnesty International, the doctor’s performance in general improved. “It is not unique to artificial intelligence systems, and it poses a danger with the introduction of any new technology,” Tucker added to SMC.
“The moral question, then, is whether we trust in artificial intelligence on humans.” “Often, we expect that there will be a person who supervises all decisions of artificial intelligence, but if human experts are making less effort in their decisions as a result of the introduction of artificial intelligence systems, this may be a problem.”
“This is not related to technology control,” says Ahmed. “It comes to navigating the complications of the new clinical ecosystem of man.” He adds, adding, which indicates that behind this study, people may need to focus on “preserving the basic skills in a world where artificial intelligence becomes everywhere.”