Is there a method that can save Intel? Craig Barrett, former CEO of Intel, is the way the company’s former board members suggest.
The former CEO of the company wrote at the end of the weekend that Intel should have a number of its customers with a total of $ 40 billion in the company to ensure a fixed supply of chips.
Barrett’s comments come at a time when the current CEO of CEO will meet with President Trump on Monday at the White House, according to a report. However, the meeting does not appear in the general evaluation of Trump.
Intel faces many crises. On the one hand, the company has already announced the demobilization of thousands of employees, which dates back to last year. Although INTEL asked billions of dollars from the United States government as part of the chips law, it has warned that it might come out of the manufacture of chips completely if it was unable to find a customer for the 14A manufacturing process. The 14A process follows the 18A process, which is the basis of Panther Lake, which said Tan who said on the right track. But Trump also demanded the step down, citing Tan’s relations with a number of Chinese companies in his role as a legitimate capitalist.
Meanwhile, Craig Barrett, former CEO of Intel, has a list of explosive ideas on this topic. Barrett, who writes in Fortune, is the former 86 -year -old CEO who took control in Intel in 1998, succeeding Andy Group. Barrett Ashraf on Pentium III and Pentium 4, as well as the first days of the Xeon processor.
Investment in the future
In Barrett minds, customers in Intel must invest to ensure stable (American) supplies of semiconductors. “Samsung or TSMC does not plan to bring its latest manufacturing to the United States in the short term,” he wrote. “The needs of the United States such as NVIDIA, Apple, Google, etc., and they should understand that they need a second source to manufacture leading products for causes of pricing, geographical stability and security of the supply line.”
Barrett suggested that Intel customers invest $ 40 billion in the company.
Barrett wrote: “Where does the money come from? Customers invest for a piece of Intel and guarantee the offer.” “Why should they invest? Local offer, second source, national security, leverage in negotiating with TSMC, etc., and if USG collects its work together, they stimulate the procedure with 50 % (or any number that Trump chooses) is a tariff on the latest imports from ART. (Parite confirmation).
Who seems to be Fortune, who appeared to be in their contact list to advise Intel Matter, previously published an opinion written by former board members on the pretext that Tan should be launched and dismantled. “Be serious,” Burrett wrote.
“By all means, if you want to complicate the problem, it takes the time to divide the Intel and make FFWBMS [the “four former wise board members”] Happy, but if you are working in the field of providing Intel and its strength in the basic manufacturing of the United States of America, you should solve the real problem – Intel immediate investment, commitment agents, national security, etc.