In this episode of our predictions series, we consider the advanced nature of the cloud, through architecture, cost management, and in fact, low infrastructure levels. Our analysts, Dana Hernandez, Ivan McVy, John Collins White Wilts, and William Macanite, asked about their ideas.
John: We see maturity of thinking about architecture, not only with cloud computing but by providing technology. Keep in mind that what we know as the cloud remains only 25 % of the total-four-four-four space is protected or hosted in private data centers. Everything should do together as a single virtual platform, or at least, the more we can do so, the more effective.
While the keyword may be “hybrid”, I expect to see a shift from hybrid environments by chance, towards the hybrid according to the design – making effective decisions based on performance, cost and already governance areas such as sovereignty. The cost management will continue to stimulate this trend, as shown by the Finops.
Dana: FINOPS develops, as many companies consider transferring or transferring work burdens from the cloud. In Finopsx, companies were looking at the costs mixed for the cloud national team. Oracle now join Big Three, Microsoft, Google and AWS, and it will be interesting to know who will jump.
John: Another clarification is to return to the homeland, move the burdens of work away from the cloud and return back.
William: Yes, the restoration is accelerated, but cloud service providers may respond by 2025, probably through competitive prices and technical developments that provide more flexibility and security. We are still moving strongly to the cloud, and it may take a few years to restore to slow down.
whit: The seller’s response was to return home. For example, Oracle under the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is undermined by their pricing form, but there are doubts – children worry that Oracle may increase costs through licensing problems.
John: We also see that cloud service providers for pure play are historic to accept hybrid models, although they may not say this loudly. For example, AWS’s local cloud show can work, for example, with the local storage of NetApp, and this type of partnership is likely to accelerate. I confirm that the “cloud” must be seen primarily as an architectural structure about dynamic supply and flexible expansion, and secondly about who the provider – with the realization that hosting companies can do better than flexibility. Organizations need architecture first.
Evan: We will also see more original cloud tools for this work burden management. For example, on the side of Sase/SSE, companies like Cato Networks see success because people do not want to install physical devices over the network. We also see this trend in NDR with companies like Lumu Technologies, where safety solutions are an original and not local cloud.
Cloud logical solutions such as Cato and Lumu Technologies networks have more prices than those associated with devices ingredients. It will be in a better position to control prices to pay adoption and growth from local traditional solutions. Some sellers explore the value -based pricing, taking into account factors such as customer work value to reach strategic accounts. This can be an exciting shift while moving to the future.